Even statstically, Burke is only a better 3-point shooter. Schroeder wins the rest of the statistical categories, including 2pt% and ft%, and dishes nearly twice as many assists in the same number of minutes. So Burke being better than Schroeder is a bad argument even if you've never seen them play. If you have, it really becomes laughable.
I wouldn't say it's "laughable" this year as there is probably an argument to be had for both sides.
I was pretty surprised when looking at the stats that they go to the FT line at basically the same rate.
And what is the argument for Burke? He's a pylon defensively and not much of a PG offensively. He's been a good outside shooter so far this year. That's about it.
I'll give Dal this much: If Dennis and Trey were on the same team, then Trey would definitely be the better backup point guard.
Even statstically, Burke is only a better 3-point shooter. Schroeder wins the rest of the statistical categories, including 2pt% and ft%, and dishes nearly twice as many assists in the same number of minutes. So Burke being better than Schroeder is a bad argument even if you've never seen them play. If you have, it really becomes laughable.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and claim that I've seen more Hawks basketball over the past couple of years than anyone on this forum (less this year, because I haven't had the time). There isn't much of an argument here; Schröder is a better player than Burke. 12 good games from Burke this year hardly changes anything, especially since he's averaging only 22 mpg (down from 32, and 30 in years one and two). And, Dennis has had more changes to which he's had to adapt this year.
This is a stupid thread.