Rose or not there was no chance of them not matching.. c'mon frank.
Rose or not there was no chance of them not matching.. c'mon frank.
I can't hope?
Chicago's group owners are notoriously cheap, like Memphis group cheap. We have a more draft picks to offer than anyone not Philly. That's not enough combined with assets to land a semi-big name RFA no matter what? I don't believe it.
I've quickly worn out my welcome, then stayed way too long afterward like everyone's Uncle Frank tends to do. Take care all <3 you all.
Snell is a very solid defender. I think Chicago would do a Burke for Snell trade straight up.
I think Burke has shown these last couple of games that he's got much more left to give and improve on. I wouldn't give up on him just yet.This is my thinking as well. With Burks coming back, we don't need two ball heavy scoring guards coming off the bench. Chicago needs a PG after Rose went down. We get flexibility and the ability to turn the 2nd unit over to Burks.
Also, we can slide Hayward to the two and play Snell/Hood at the three.
Snell will be a great shooter in the NBA. He is shooting 55% from three this month.
I'd do Burke and our pick for Snell (as long as our pick is not top 10).
Snell is a solid defender, on a rookie contract, and a very, very good shooter. I'd trade Burke for him in a heartbeat. Chicago needs a PG. We need a shooter. Match made in heaven.