What's new

Can the C.J. Miles experiment please end?

Status
Not open for further replies.
CJ is the exact same player he was 7 years ago.

It's insane how he hasn't ever improved. Nor has he gotten any stronger physically or mentally. His retarded fouls aren't even committed by rookies. It's mind boggling to me why Burks isn't playing.
 
After bell is gone, then Cj can go.

I dedicate this one to you:

AlecBurks10.jpg




Please fill out the following form so other unsuspecting fans wont' get ripped off in the future. TIA.

https://www.scamchecker.com/category/person-name/raja-bell
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, this statement shows just how low we've set the bar for this stank piece of refuse. There was a period (I believe late third quarter) where CJ went into full-out hopper mode for three seconds, did a lame crossover, pulled back, and shot up a very long two that hit nothing but backboard. In the few minutes following,he continued his sucktitude by committing two (or maybe it was just one?) atrociously awful fouls, making a dumbass turnover (that somehow is not in the box score), losing his man on defense (and this man subsequently hit a three) and doing something else dumb which is just blending in with the rest of ****tiness right now.

If we're objective about this, is it really good that analysts and some fans think he had a good game when he, overall, was just 5-12 from the floor (41.66%), drew no fouls and therefore had no free throw attempts, committed three fouls (a couple of which were beyond dumb), had his shot blocked three times (do those count as shots--if not he was really 5-15), and had just one assist? 11 points on 12 shots? That's a good game for him?

His contract can't end soon enough.

I remember resigning him was one of Gregg's first decisions. LHM was in the hospital and said he thought 4mil/yr was too much for CJ, but supported Gregg's decision. Turns out 4mil/yr WAS too much to pay for what CJ has done since signing that contract.
 
I remember resigning him was one of Gregg's first decisions. LHM was in the hospital and said he thought 4mil/yr was too much for CJ, but supported Gregg's decision. Turns out 4mil/yr WAS too much to pay for what CJ has done since signing that contract.

Wait wait wait, you mean for 4 mill he was expected to actually, you know, IMPROVE? Oh puh-leeze, you need at least 6-8 mill to expect improvement. 4 mill buys you a guy who is playing pickup ball while everyone else watches.

Apparently.
 
CJ makes tons of mistakes but he has made some very important plays defensively and on the boards.
no he didn't really. when you play 24min/game any useless scrub can get some lose balls that fall in his direction. In the last 2 games he averaged 4.5 rebounds but do you really care about an improvement of 2 rebounds/game?

his stats until now look as horrible as predicted:

MIN--FG%--3P%--FT%--REB-AST-BLK-STL--TO-PTS
20.3-.327--.368--.647---2.3--0.2-0.3--1.2--1.3-9.0
 
no he didn't really. when you play 24min/game any useless scrub can get some lose balls that fall in his direction. In the last 2 games he averaged 4.5 rebounds but do you really care about an improvement of 2 rebounds/game?

his stats until now look as horrible as predicted:

MIN--FG%--3P%--FT%--REB-AST-BLK-STL--TO-PTS
20.3-.327--.368--.647---2.3--0.2-0.3--1.2--1.3-9.0

You're miene liebling poster. Or something like that.
 
no he didn't really. when you play 24min/game any useless scrub can get some lose balls that fall in his direction. In the last 2 games he averaged 4.5 rebounds but do you really care about an improvement of 2 rebounds/game?

his stats until now look as horrible as predicted:

MIN--FG%--3P%--FT%--REB-AST-BLK-STL--TO-PTS
20.3-.327--.368--.647---2.3--0.2-0.3--1.2--1.3-9.0

How are these stats that bad for a shooter?
Almost 37 percent from 3 is pretty respectable, although 33 percent at the rim.... and 64.7 from the free throw line is pretty bad.
Get this guy open shots from 3 where he is set, and he'll come through for you.
He's like a Shane Battier with some more hops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top