1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.d4 exd4
4.Nxd4 Bc5
5.Be3 Nf6
6.Nc3 Nxd4
7.Bxd4 d6
8.h3 Qe7
9.Bxc5 dxc5
10.Qf3 Bd7
11.0-0-0 0-0-0
12.Bd3 Bc6
13.R(h1)e1 R(h8)e8
14.Qe3 Rd4
15.f3 R(e8)d8
16.Nb5 Bxb5
17.Bxb5 Qe6
18.Qa3 Qd6
19.Rxd4 Qxd4
20.Bd3 c4
21.Rd1 Qe3+
22.Kb1 cxd3
23.Qf8+ Rd8
24.Qxg7 Qd3+
25.Ka1 Qc2
26.Rb1 Rd1
27.Qf8+ Kd7
And here come the torrent of checks while I move my king down the board.
It's the only thing to do. . .. . for me, at least.
Qxf7+
edit. . . . two minutes later. . . . . wait, it's not?
So the Rook can't check you because you'll simply take it and mate. If I can't prevent you from turning the corner in front of your paws, you can interpose the Rook and still have a one move checkmate by your Queen.
But if I can take any position with my Queen that's protected by a pawn, and fork your King and Queen, and then take your rook in a move that also checks you, I will win.
I might also win if I can check you with my Queen from behind, forcing you to expose your Queen unprotected when you move your King out of check.
I might also win if I just trade out Queen and Rook, by advancing a pawn in an open file while your King can't get in front of it or take it.
I might also force a draw if you do Kc8/Kd7 rocker, but you could prevent that with a Rook interposition, maybe.
I might win also if I can check you from behind if you're too close to my two pawns. . . .
But if you can evade check even once without losing a mate threat position, I'm cooked.