I haven't a clue what you folks are talking about.
I could never bear to delve I to chess books. Makes as much sense as reading a book on mud wrestling.
One Brow vs. babe
![]()
1. d4 d5
2. c4 dxc
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 e6
5. Bg5 Be7
6. e3 Nd5
7. Bxe7 Qxe7
8. Bxc4 Qb4
9. Qb3 Qxb3
10. Bxb3 c6
11. 0-0 Nd7
12. Nxd4 exd
13. Rfc1 Nf6
14. Ba4 Bd7
15. b4 b5
16. Bb3 0-0
17. Ne5 Rfc1
18. Rc2 a5
19. bxa Bd8
20. Rac1 Ra6
21. f3 g6
22. Ng4 Kg2
23. Nxf6 Kxf6
24. Bxd5 Ke7
25. Rc5

Ectya (Enes CanTear You Apart) has suggested we start a blitz tournament for JazzFanz. I can organize and keep track of scores if enough people are interested. We could try it with as little as four players or as many as eight or more. I have in mind a double round-robin with a five minute time control for each player, so if we have four players you would play each person twice, black and white, for a total of six games.
The time commitment is only about fifteen minutes (twenty maximum) to play one player twice. If we try to finish all the games in a week or so there should be plenty of time for players to arrange to be online for three separate fifteen minute windows. The two people playing each other would make their own arrangements for a window that works for both and then post the results here.
Since ectya and myself are interested we need just two more players to get things going. The suggested website (lichess.org) is easy and intuitive to play; one player goes to the site, starts a game, sets the time controls, and then posts a link here (the link is done automatically by pressing the "play a friend" button), the other player clicks on the link at the arranged time, and away you go.
Blitz is a great way to sharpen your tactics while playing a wide variety of games in a short amount of time. By nature, the games are much more likely to be wild and aggressive as both players try to win by force before time expires. It should be fun, so no reason not to at least try a few blitz games! Please let us know if you're interested.
One Brow vs. babe
![]()
1. d4 d5
2. c4 dxc
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 e6
5. Bg5 Be7
6. e3 Nd5
7. Bxe7 Qxe7
8. Bxc4 Qb4
9. Qb3 Qxb3
10. Bxb3 c6
11. 0-0 Nd7
12. Nxd4 exd
13. Rfc1 Nf6
14. Ba4 Bd7
15. b4 b5
16. Bb3 0-0
17. Ne5 Rfc1
18. Rc2 a5
19. bxa Bd8
20. Rac1 Ra6
21. f3 g6
22. Ng4 Kg2
23. Nxf6 Kxf6
24. Bxd5 Ke7
25. Rc5 f5
26. e4
I agree that your taking the initiative would be a good thing for you. It will be interesting to see what you have in mind for that.

You keep passing up your chances to take the defensive.
One Brow vs. babe
![]()
1. d4 d5
2. c4 dxc
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 e6
5. Bg5 Be7
6. e3 Nd5
7. Bxe7 Qxe7
8. Bxc4 Qb4
9. Qb3 Qxb3
10. Bxb3 c6
11. 0-0 Nd7
12. Nxd4 exd
13. Rfc1 Nf6
14. Ba4 Bd7
15. b4 b5
16. Bb3 0-0
17. Ne5 Rfc1
18. Rc2 a5
19. bxa Bd8
20. Rac1 Ra6
21. f3 g6
22. Ng4 Kg2
23. Nxf6 Kxf6
24. Bxd5 Ke7
25. Rc5 f5
26. e4 Bd7
27. Bb3
I'm sorry. I'll try harder. Here, I'll retreat my bishop for you.
Let me know if I got your bishop move wrong. d3 would have been behind my pawns.
One Brow vs. babe
![]()
1. d4 d5
2. c4 dxc
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 e6
5. Bg5 Be7
6. e3 Nd5
7. Bxe7 Qxe7
8. Bxc4 Qb4
9. Qb3 Qxb3
10. Bxb3 c6
11. 0-0 Nd7
12. Nxd4 exd
13. Rfc1 Nf6
14. Ba4 Bd7
15. b4 b5
16. Bb3 0-0
17. Ne5 Rfc1
18. Rc2 a5
19. bxa Bd8
20. Rac1 Ra6
21. f3 g6
22. Ng4 Kg2
23. Nxf6 Kxf6
24. Bxd5 Ke7
25. Rc5 f5
26. e4 Bd7
27. Bb3
I'm sorry. I'll try harder. Here, I'll retreat my bishop for you.
Let me know if I got your bishop move wrong. d3 would have been behind my pawns.