LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
However, they do recommend exercise routinely, and deviate from that routine only under special circumstances. By contrast, circumcision is not recommended routinely, because its benefits little outweigh its risks.
https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_adults/en/
Physical activity for all
These recommendations are relevant to all healthy adults aged 18–64 years unless specific medical conditions indicate to the contrary. They are applicable for all adults irrespective of gender, race, ethnicity or income level. They also apply to individuals in this age range with chronic noncommunicable conditions not related to mobility such as hypertension or diabetes.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/penilecancer/detailedguide/penile-cancer-prevention
Most public health researchers believe that the risk of penile cancer is low among uncircumcised men without known risk factors living in the United States. Men who wish to lower their risk of penile cancer can do so by avoiding HPV infection and not smoking. Those who aren't circumcised can also lower their risk of penile cancer by practicing good hygiene. Most experts agree that circumcision should not be recommended solely as a way to prevent penile cancer.
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756.full
Parents should weigh the health benefits and risks in light of their own religious, cultural, and personal preferences, as the medical benefits alone may not outweigh these other considerations for individual families.
So exercise for everyone except in specific circumstances, but cutural norms and personal preference may outweigh the benefits for circumcision. If the reigning authority can safely claim that personal preference is a valid reason to not circumcise a child then it sounds like the science is stating that it is probably a good idea, but not really that important.