What's new

Circumcision ?

You mean like the part where you claim your opinion on the matter is equal to science and fact? Or the part where you claim "overwhelming" scientific evidence, then post links that say it isn't recommended as a routine procedure, then you claim that since routine procedures can have exceptions your opinion is again equal to scientific fact? Gotcha. You win TBS, you win. Your overwhelming religious connection to facts and science, regardless of what the words actually stated, have overwhelmed us all.

You are really splitting hairs when it says "doesn't recommend done universally" but rather says "newborns are better off circumcised."

Once again I rest my case. I don't have the time or the crayons.
 
You are really splitting hairs when it says "doesn't recommend done universally" but rather says "newborns are better off circumcised."

Once again I rest my case. I don't have the time or the crayons.

I can only imagine what orifice you've shoved all your crayons into.
 
If I had them I would shove them into my eyes because I am tired of reading the anti circumcision pseudoscience you and AKMVP keep posting.

I haven't really used "science" as my argument. My biggest argument in favor of not altering the penis is the functional aspect. You can reduce UTIs and rare cancers all you want, I like sex and making it as enjoyable as possible. Foreskin helps. You'll never understand. That's okay with me.
 
I would really like to put my foreskin in something. OH wait, I can't...
thanks-obama-for-screwing-up-my-future.jpg
 
I haven't really used "science" as my argument. My biggest argument in favor of not altering the penis is the functional aspect. You can reduce UTIs and rare cancers all you want, I like sex and making it as enjoyable as possible. Foreskin helps. You'll never understand. That's okay with me.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734995/

Prostate cancer. Here... Already linked cervical cancer and penile cancer.

I have already linked that there is no evidence that circumcision reduces sexual pleasure, which continues to remains unrefuted despite what you, AKMVP, and other psueduscholars and nonscientists may think.
 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734995/

Prostate cancer. Here... Already linked cervical cancer and penile cancer.

I have already linked that there is no evidence that circumcision reduces sexual pleasure, which continues to remains unrefuted despite what you, AKMVP, and other psueduscholars and nonscientists may think.

Okay, I know what it does for me. Do you know? Can you know? Nope, daddy made that decision for you so you would look like him. Congratulations.

I'm happy. You say you're happy (even though I doubt you've so much as touched a boobie) so live and let live. Root for the home team and don't look back, bro.
 
Okay, I know what it does for me. Do you know? Can you know? Nope, daddy made that decision for you so you would look like him. Congratulations.

I'm happy. You say you're happy (even though I doubt you've so much as touched a boobie) so live and let live. Root for the home team and don't look back, bro.

I've touched all kindz of boobies. Yes woman ones, and no I am not counting my mom.
 
If I felt like there was a problem with my body I could make the decision to change it. I'm in the catbird's seat. It's nice up here.
 
Doctors never universally recommend anything. Even exercise cannot be universally recommended because it is bad for people with a variety of different conditions. "Newborns are better of circumcised." Fair enough....

However, they do recommend exercise routinely, and deviate from that routine only under special circumstances. By contrast, circumcision is not recommended routinely, because its benefits little outweigh its risks.
 
Back
Top