Park Bites
Well-Known Member
This thread title to should changed to Clarkson likely to get traded
Just dont see it happening.This thread title to should changed to Clarkson likely to get traded
Just dont see it happening.
I just dont think any team is going to pony up what it takes to get him seeing as he is going to be a half-year rental. Maybe the Lakers would since they would be pretty confident at having an inside track to re-sign him (assuming they get bird rights, not sure if thats the case tho).
And does anyone think Donny is going to stay in Cleveland? They better hang on to Garland until they are sure and I doubt Donny stays in Cleveland.lmfao
Garland isnt an ideal fit with Mitchell, but you are being a bit ridiculous here. If they really wanted to, they could trade Garland and get a boatload for him, he is very very good.
No sir... his stats are good... he is very good. He may be a candidate for 3rd team all-nba. He might end up being a top 15-20 guy at his peak... if you don't have a top 5 guy you will need a couple top 20 guys.If Lauri plays like he has over the last month and a half then the answer to your question is yes. He has been playing like a first team all nba league mvp candidate stats wise.
They probably will trade Garland this time next season, if they lose to easy in the playoffs this season, mostly because of Garlands defensive switching issues being a massive hole next to Mitchell. Even though Mitchell is actually buying into the defense Cavs running so it seems, he needs a competent 2 way guard with him for any playoff series or he will burn out quick. I have the Cavs getting a kings ransom if they were to deal Garland next season after the Cavs made a deep playoff run or something, but if that happens Don aint leaving and they aint trading any core players either.And does anyone think Donny is going to stay in Cleveland? They better hang on to Garland until they are sure and I doubt Donny stays in Cleveland.
I am not saying shoot for the moon in the draft... I am saying hope to get in the top 2 if you can. If we land 8/9 that is great and I'd choose Cason or Black. I think they can be higher upside than maybe is assumed. You will still need to land someone that gets to Lauri's level or is such a perfect complimentary piece (like prime Khris Middleton) that the whole becomes more than the sum of their parts. I just don't see Lauri getting to Dirk's level (go ahead and throw per game stats at me if you'd like.... there is definitely some inflation going on right now.. a direct comparison gets you in the same trouble we did when thinking Donovan was as good as MJ).I would say yeah, I think Lauri can be a #1 on a championship team. Dirk did it, I think Lauri can too if you put the right team around him.
I dont think you have to have a shoot for the moon mentality. For instance, if the Jazz have the choice between Cason Wallace and GG Jackson, I'd probably go with Cason. Sure, GG does have higher potential to hit as a 20+ PPG #1/#2 scoring option, but Cason provides so many high level intagibles at a pretty valuable position, so I'd rather have him to pair next to Lauri than the potential of a high level scorer.
This thread title to should changed to Clarkson likely to get traded
We can take him and trade as many 1st round we had roger #1score and more!I would say yeah, I think Lauri can be a #1 on a championship team. Dirk did it, I think Lauri can too if you put the right team around him.
I dont think you have to have a shoot for the moon mentality. For instance, if the Jazz have the choice between Cason Wallace and GG Jackson, I'd probably go with Cason. Sure, GG does have higher potential to hit as a 20+ PPG #1/#2 scoring option, but Cason provides so many high level intagibles at a pretty valuable position, so I'd rather have him to pair next to Lauri than the potential of a high level scorer.
And what # did we draft Donovan and Gobert at? FYI, we are gonna get higher picks than those 2 were selected with this year FOR SURE. The biggest thing with those 2 wasnt that we drafted them.... It was that we developed them to become the players they are. Much like we are seeing Lauri being developed.How did we get that stuff we traded? Oh we drafted him.
Hitting on picks is so crucial for success in non FA destination markets. You can maneuver through trades and sign a FA here and there… but the vast majority of AS talent will come from the draft.
Remember… to get where we want to go we aren’t just trying to find an all star to pair with Lauri… we are trying to find an all star better than Lauri. As great as he has been does anyone think Lauri is the #1 on a finals team? On a conference finals team? We aren’t just looking for starters… we looking for stars.
JC is the better playmaker and scorer in general. But Trent Jr is a million times better defender which I think this team really needs. Plus he is much younger like you said.FWIW the Raptor fans want to trade Gary Trent Jr because apparently Klutch wants a new contract extension starting at $25 mil per season with raises.
JC might be the better all around player when you factor in his playmaking although he's obviously older than GTJ.
I just believe we better be prepared to see Klutch demand a huge contract for JC. We shall see how it plays out. Obviously Danny and the org are having these types of internal talks right now.