Compelling Pro Life Argument

[jimmy eat jazz]

Yes. Many people will have a hard time explaining their actions to their grandkids. It is going to be fun to read all the books from trump insiders explaining his idiocy and how they tried their best to help guide this buffoon, but to no avail.

Contrast to bush 2, who despite being a weak president, he acted with dignity, treated people with respect, and was mentioned fondly by his staff and adversaries alike. He is a decent human being. In contrast with..... well, you know.

With regards to Bush 2, I have a hard time to call someone a decent human being who authorized the policy of extreme rendition and state torture. That's evil sh** right there.

The difference between him and Trump is that Bush probably supported and authorized the policy as a 'pragmatic' (but evil) policy, but probably didn't relish the thought of it, while Trumpersterfire would get a verified, solid woody doing it, as I imagine would be the case for most weak and insecure bullies.

 

[MVP]

There is nothing in my opinion the insists that anyone has to believe in God. .

Women are stewards of their bodies, and all decisions on what goes in or out of their orifices should remain solely within the closed council of i) the woman and ii) God.

Maybe I am reading it wrong?

 

[Stoked]

Maybe I am reading it wrong?

You are. It allows for a God if said individual woman believes in a God. But nothing requires that belief.

 

[Engorged On Unborn Gore]

You are. It allows for a God if said individual woman believes in a God. But nothing requires that belief.

Exactly. Which reduces the decision-making think tank to just the woman if she happens to be atheist, agnostic, or whatever.

Also, women’s opinions on birth/abortion should count the same as the collected opinions of 1000 men on these matters. For the simple fact that women can back up their opinions with blood from their body every ****ing month.

 

[MVP]

You are. It allows for a God if said individual woman believes in a God. But nothing requires that belief.

It is way too complicated, just leave it to the woman to decide, period.

 

[Engorged On Unborn Gore]

It is way too complicated, just leave it to the woman to decide, period.

I’m not making any rules for you. I’m just explaining my rules for me. Any interpretation that you project onto that is just your own shenanigans.

 

[jimmy eat jazz]

The means of production are controlled publicly in socialism. The means of production are controlled by the monarch in an absolute monarchy. From this you cannot conclude that monarchies are socialist, but rather that monarchies and socialist systems share a this attribute.

If John holds an apple and Susie holds an apple, you can't conclude that John is Susie.

So your statement is indeed ridiculous because of the tortured logic that you are using.

Socialism also includes some aspect of labor organization and power divested to the labor force. That most assuredly wasn't the case in any monarchy of yesteryear.

 

[Stoked]

It is way too complicated, just leave it to the woman to decide, period.

And some women will include their god. This isnt complicated at all. It’s their decision. That’s the point.

 

[Eminence]

The means of production are controlled publicly in socialism. The means of production are controlled by the monarch in an absolute monarchy. From this you cannot conclude that monarchies are socialist, but rather that monarchies and socialist systems share a this attribute.

If John holds an apple and Susie holds an apple, you can't conclude that John is Susie.

So your statement is indeed ridiculous because of the tortured logic that you are using.

Do you really feel the means of production are publicly controlled at all in China?

Communist leaders is bordering on oxymoron itself.

 

[silesian]

Communist leaders is bordering on oxymoron itself.

If you don't think Xi Jinping is a leader, I'm not sure what you think the word "leader" means. He categorically has control of both the party and the country.

 

[silesian]

Do you really feel the means of production are publicly controlled at all in China?

Yes the state has many controls over the means of production. Take a look at their 5-year plan, it is quite prescriptive. it is complex and mixed with capitalism as I've noted earlier.