What's new
By:

Congresswoman shot.

Stickler said:
Could this young man have been a CIA operative carrying out a well-orchestrated kamikaze mission? What could be better for the Democrats, now, than to secure their stranglehold on America by creating an event that could lead to the end of free speech? Think about it: In the wake of Wikileaks, we already see them erasing whistle-blower protections. We already see the FDA under Obama's administration compromising the freedom of the internet. If an event occurred -- such as this shooting -- that could be blamed on the propaganda (as the Commucrats would call it) of the right-wing, it would set the stage for Obama to finally begin to regulate the air-waves, to silence Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones... In furtherance of the New World Agenda, B. Hussein Obama will use every power of his administration to silence we, the righteous opposition. We cannot let that happen. We must be ever vigilant. We must be ever watchful. We must prepare for the polar shift, and wait for our chance to (strike that)... wait for our time.

Of course tonight we grieve along with the families of the injured and the deceased. Join me in praying for the souls of the innocent. Join me in praying for the destruction of our enemies, the Democrats.
Click to expand...
I'm sure your post was tongue in cheek, but there are some facts that actually support some of the things you said. First off, the FCC did recently kill Net Neutrality:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-aaron/net-neutrality-haters-lov_b_799266.html

And now Obama is going to give every American a unique Internet Identification:
https://www.engadget.com/2011/01/09...-moves-forward-with-unique-internet-id-for-a/

And this is after things like this happened (in a pathetic attempt to prevent Wikileaks from sharing any info):
https://mashable.com/2010/11/27/homeland-security-website-seized/

I'm no right wing nutjob, I actually voted for Obama. But what he is doing (and allowing to happen under his watch) should be downright scary to any American paying attention.
 
Duck Rodgers said:
Please enlighten us. What does the tea party support that is so dangerous? The constitution? Freedom? I've never a seen a lick of evidence that it's a violent movement. The tea party aren't going to be the people smashing windows and causing violence when **** hits the fan, that much is clear by the actions of the far left in other countries. The left in this country are all wannabe Europeans, their story has already been told.
Click to expand...
Are you serious? Here is a good start:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU9GXil9Vm8
 
SaltyDawg said:
I'm sure your post was tongue in cheek, but there are some facts that actually support some of the things you said. First off, the FCC did recently kill Net Neutrality:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-aaron/net-neutrality-haters-lov_b_799266.html

And now Obama is going to give every American a unique Internet Identification:
https://www.engadget.com/2011/01/09...-moves-forward-with-unique-internet-id-for-a/

And this is after things like this happened (in a pathetic attempt to prevent Wikileaks from sharing any info):
https://mashable.com/2010/11/27/homeland-security-website-seized/

I'm no right wing nutjob, I actually voted for Obama. But what he is doing (and allowing to happen under his watch) should be downright scary to any American paying attention.
Click to expand...

And even though he misidentified the FDA, there was a recent Food Safety bill passed that has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with codex alimentarius - more control. International control. FDA contol. You can feel Monsanto bursting at its genetically modified seems with happiness. Auswitchz Chicken Farms can hardly contain their feed.
 
I miss the version of Duck Rodgers that pined over some girlfriend and constantly asked for relationship advice. Where did that lovable loser go?

This new conspiracy theorist version is kind of no fun.
 
New pet theory:

A lot of Loughner's incoherent ramblings start to have a certain internal logic if you believe he misheard the term "Tetragrammaton" as Tetragrammarton.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetragrammaton

His stuff about god, the army, and government control of grammar is further harmonized into paranoid fears due to this misunderstanding if he's seen the movie "Equilibirium" which uses the title "Tetragrammaton" in an even more specific way.
 
Sirkickyass said:
I miss the version of Duck Rodgers that pined over some girlfriend and constantly asked for relationship advice. Where did that lovable loser go?

This new conspiracy theorist version is kind of no fun.
Click to expand...

Heck, kicky, I'm with you on that sentiment. LOL.


I really think he needs to get laid or something.

edit: Maybe he's getting laid too much and he needs to get dumped. That might bring the old Duck back to us.
 
and now the latest i've read seems to indicate they believe he acted alone. I still find it hard to believe it truly was "politically" motivated - - but Loughner definitely seems to have some major screws loose. I haven't read too much of the stuff they've quoted from him, but what I have reads makes no sense at all, even when I try to look at it from the perspective of a truly warped mind.


That clip that Salty posted is pretty scary. Yikes.

and I came across this:
...During his campaign effort to unseat Giffords in November, Republican challenger Jesse Kelly held fundraisers where he urged supporters to help remove Giffords from office by joining him to shoot a fully loaded M-16 rifle. Kelly is a former Marine who served in Iraq and was pictured on his website in military gear holding his automatic weapon and promoting the event.

"I don't see the connection," between the fundraisers featuring weapons and Saturday's shooting, said John Ellinwood, Kelly's spokesman. "I don't know this person, we cannot find any records that he was associated with the campaign in any way. I just don't see the connection" ...
Click to expand...

https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110109/ap_on_re_us/us_congresswoman_shot

perhaps no direct connection between Loughner and the campaign of Jesse Kelly, but reading about the rhetoric and imagery of that campaign is pretty disturbing and clearly portrays that candidate and his spokesmen as advocating something that many would find objectionable
 
Last edited:
Wow, just read the yahoo news article about the arrest and say that one of the people killed was a little girl born on Sept 11, 2001. My daughter was born exactly 2 weeks later. Kinda makes it all hit home.
 
Duck Rodgers said:
The whole thing was about 2nd amendment response to a tyrannical government and you're saying that's kooky? She didn't say go out and shoot someone, she was simply observing that people might eventually have to fight for their rights. Do you not believe it could come to that? It has before.
Click to expand...

Ok, so you've had a chance to voice your incorrect opinion. Now here's the actual quote:

You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years.

I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is t
ake Harry Reid out.
Click to expand...

Summary:

This Congress needs to do what "The People" want. If not, then under the writings of Thomas Jefferson (spawned from others writings such as Thomas Paine's Common Sense), the people have "A Right" for revolution.
If Conservatives feel like they aren't being listened, and feel that Liberals are trampling over their rights, and that they government is being "Tyrannical" then they have a right to abolish that government... By any means necessary... Even violence... Which is why the 2nd amendment (right to bear arms) was created.

We can start by taking Harry Reid out. (Obviously inferring the ballet box. However, she doesn't exactly rule out taking him out by physical force. Otherwise, she wouldn't have even mentioned all that crap about the 2nd amendment, revolutions, etc.).

This is why all political parties and media need to start acting more responsibly. It's not a game. Hundreds of loyalists were tortured, displaced, raped, and killed because of propaganda. Today, powerful agents of the media and the right wing are spewing hatred. While ultimately the responsibility of actions fall upon individuals, the individual influence of few is felt by the many.

Thanks for playing!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top