What's new
By:

Cowherd basically rips Jazz.....

Gas said:
Different Roster, Young players maturing. Lebrons gravity and passing ability open things up.





You said the Lakers dont shoot threes. They do. See also my response to Cy.

Posting player's three point percentage who dont even play, and/or who suck at every other facet of the game isnt a good point, a doesnt mean they are bettter players to put around Lebron.

Korver - has always sucked. I would never want him on my team. He doesn't help you win.

JR Smith - See game 1 of finals.

Hood - doesnt play

Calderon - lmao, are you kidding me?

Love - overrated, doesnt help you win

Hill - Not good either. He is being passed around for a reason. He hasnt done **** since playing for the Jazz and benefitting from the system.
Click to expand...
Not a single 40% 3pt shooter on that team. I didn't say they don't shoot them, I said they weren't shooters. Those guys aren't scaring anybody, and if you aren't worried about outside shots when you play Lebron you pack the paint and make things hard on him. It makes him less effective and hurts the team.

I think the Lakers had 1 good move in the off season and then they went out and signed a bunch of vets they shouldn't have. Rondo, Stevenson and the others they signed are not good fits around Lebron. The guys they already had are okay around Lebron but if you want to make the most of his talent you surround him with shooters, the Lakers didn't.
 
Gas said:
Because nothing changes and everything is exactly the same as last year

#notcaughtonyet
Click to expand...
You apparently cant read because I said they could get better, but they won't be top 15 (15th would signify league median). It would be hard for them to be as bad as last year, but they still won't be a good shooting team. You can ignore logic/facts/history all you want. They arent a good shooting team and they have numerous terrible shooters.
 
Gas said:
Different Roster, Young players maturing. Lebrons gravity and passing ability open things up.





You said the Lakers dont shoot threes. They do. See also my response to Cy.

Posting player's three point percentage who dont even play, and/or who suck at every other facet of the game isnt a good point, a doesnt mean they are bettter players to put around Lebron.

Korver - has always sucked. I would never want him on my team. He doesn't help you win.

JR Smith - See game 1 of finals.

Hood - doesnt play

Calderon - lmao, are you kidding me?

Love - overrated, doesnt help you win

Hill - Not good either. He is being passed around for a reason. He hasnt done **** since playing for the Jazz and benefitting from the system.
Click to expand...

After reading your posts in this thread I'm convinced that you're an idiot lakers homer from SoCAL. You probably sport a pair of fake boobs. Korver and Love don't help you win games but Kuzma does? What's the next ? Ball is the goat PG in the making ?
 
gregbroncs said:
The Lakers surrounded Lebron with a bunch of guys who don't shoot 3's. That is the opposite of what Lebron needs around him. The Cavs were better set up to support what Lebron does best. Love is probably the best player on either roster not named Lebron, I'd not take him over those guys because they are younger with more upside, but he's the most proven and right now better player.
Click to expand...
gregbroncs said:
Not a single 40% 3pt shooter on that team. I didnt say they dont shoot them, I said they weren't shooters. Those guys aren't scaring anybody, and if you aren't worried about outside shots when you play Lebron you pack the paint and make things hard on him. It makes him less effective and hurts the team.

I think the Lakers had 1 good move in the off season and then they went out and signed a bunch of vets they shouldn't have. Rondo, Stevenson and the others they signed are not good fits around Lebron. The guys they already had are okay around Lebron but if you want to make the most of his talent you surround him with shooters, the Lakers didn't.
Click to expand...

Actually, its exactly what you said.

Haha.

I know what you mean, but kind of funny for you to say that.
 
New_Jazz_Order said:
After reading your posts in this thread I'm convinced that you're an idiot lakers homer from SoCAL. You probably sport a pair of fake boobs. Korver and Love don't help you win games but Kuzma does? What's the next ? Ball is the goat PG in the making ?
Click to expand...

You shouldn't ever accept jury duty. People dont need you getting "convinced". Too much is at stake.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
You apparently cant read because I said they could get better, but they won't be top 15 (15th would signify league median). It would be hard for them to be as bad as last year, but they still won't be a good shooting team. You can ignore logic/facts/history all you want. They arent a good shooting team and they have numerous terrible shooters.
Click to expand...
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Cool, they were the 2nd worst shooting team last year and they didnt add any shooting outside of rookies and Lebron. I doubt they will be in the top 15 of shooting percentage next year.
Click to expand...

Wait, where did it say that?
 
My take is the Cowherd is an loud-mouth idiot, Lakers are going to be good and Joe Ingles is an above average defender. Lakers are going to run and gun. They were not great shooters last year but they have Lebron to take away attention which opens up looks for other guys. The Lakers played the Jazz tough in a few of the games so I won't be surprised if they beat the Jazz this year. Jazz deserve more respect than Cowherd is giving them but that is what happens when you are bias towards the big market teams. Got to promote and make $$$$ for your TV station.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top