What's new
By:

Damian Lillard?

Hack said:
Damn you guys suck as GM'S


There is a very good argument that you wouldn't trade Hayward straight up for Lillard. I know I wouldnt.
Click to expand...
Damn you suck
 
I really like Lillard, all my buddies are Blazer fans and brag about how good he is. However the kid is overrated. He is a really good offensive PG but sucks pretty bad on D. Lillard does have his clutch moments, but did anyone notice how he disappeared against Memphis in the playoffs?
I doubt he will be able to carry Portland as the lone star, maybe Portland would be willing to trade him but I doubt it. Even then it'd take a lot to get him. I don't wanna trade Exum for Lillard, Exum is already a great defender.
 
Hack said:
Damn you guys suck as GM'S


There is a very good argument that you wouldn't trade Hayward straight up for Lillard. I know I wouldnt.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't. No question. Point guard is loaded and wings are a commodity. That alone Hayward>Lillard.
 
franklin said:
I wouldn't. No question. Point guard is loaded and wings are a commodity. That alone Hayward>Lillard.
Click to expand...

Yeah but Hood gonna be better than Hayward, so stay with Hood and Hayward or with Lillard and Hood? I go with the latter thank you.
 
jope said:
last season, Dlil had a better defRtg than Exum (105 vs 109), and 6'3'' is short for a pg now?
Click to expand...

have you actually ever watched a game and seen him play "defense" ? He did an awesome disappearing act for the last third of the season and playoffs. Overrated Nice player but he aint taking a team to the promised land
 
DownUnder said:
have you actually ever watched a game and seen him play "defense" ? He did an awesome disappearing act for the last third of the season and playoffs. Overrated Nice player but he aint taking a team to the promised land
Click to expand...

I went to Weber state during his tenure. I've seen plenty. I've also seen how much a system impacts defence, far more than an individual. His athleticism and size show nothing that indicates he couldn't be effective in the right system.
 
mhindy said:
I doubt they would consider moving him as he is still young, but it would take an absurd package to bring him in.

Probably Exum, Hood, multiple picks as a starting point.
Click to expand...
Im thinking Exum and Favors and a **** ton of picks
Jamezz said:
Yeah but Hood gonna be better than Hayward, so stay with Hood and Hayward or with Lillard and Hood? I go with the latter thank you.
Click to expand...

Or how about Exum Hood and Hayward and Burks. I like that better. Not sure Lill will take us to a title. As we stand we are one lucky Break away from a title. Maybe that's one of Hayward Favors hood Burks or Exm becoming a star or we get lucky in the draft or a trade or something. I just don't feel Lill is the answer.
 
jope said:
I went to Weber state during his tenure. I've seen plenty. I've also seen how much a system impacts defence, far more than an individual. His athleticism and size show nothing that indicates he couldn't be effective in the right system.
Click to expand...

so it's fair to say you're a little biased ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top