What's new

Darius Garland

BTW I love Garland. Better passer than Don. Would be over the moon if we got him. If he can stop getting weird *** injuries that would be great. I think they were kinda dumb to go for Don with him on the roster... if it rocked the boat enough to get him to ask out that is some 3d Chess by DA.

I think you may be able to build a contender better around Garland than you can around Donovan. Even if Garland isn't as dynamic as a scorer.
 
BTW I love Garland. Better passer than Don. Would be over the moon if we got him. If he can stop getting weird *** injuries that would be great. I think they were kinda dumb to go for Don with him on the roster... if it rocked the boat enough to get him to ask out that is some 3d Chess by DA.

I think you may be able to build a contender better around Garland than you can around Donovan. Even if Garland isn't as dynamic as a scorer.

They have 4 really good players, but have pairings that don't have a great fit. I ultimately think they trade Mitchell to BKN.
 
They have 4 really good players, but have pairings that don't have a great fit. I ultimately think they trade Mitchell to BKN.
Brooklyn, NY, or Miami maybe. Nets for Harris, DFS and picks. NY Barrett, Quickley, picks. Miami Herro + picks.

I think Brooklyn and Miami make the most sense and I think Brooklyn's package is a lot better. Those Suns picks could be really juicy... they also have some Philly picks. I'm sure Nets would try and have the Cavs eat Simmons deal but that would be a no go unless they add more stuff.
 
Brooklyn, NY, or Miami maybe. Nets for Harris, DFS and picks. NY Barrett, Quickley, picks. Miami Herro + picks.

I think Brooklyn and Miami make the most sense and I think Brooklyn's package is a lot better. Those Suns picks could be really juicy... they also have some Philly picks. I'm sure Nets would try and have the Cavs eat Simmons deal but that would be a no go unless they add more stuff.

Speaking of dumb PG ideas, what about Ben S**********.

Kidding, or am I?
 
He has 2 years $78M left on his deal.
You’re absolutely right, I didn’t look closely enough. That does make him more interesting to me. One year to try him out and if it doesn’t work out he’s a big expiring the year after. Still too much money though, but he’s the ultimate reclamation project that could benefit from a fresh start in a small market. Shame he probably doesn’t have the mindset for it. He’s got the size, playmaking and defense we’re after.
Also a shame he’s a bit of a douchebag.
 
If they are trading Garland they are trading him for win now pieces. Why are the Jazz giving up their win now pieces for a 6'1 guard?

A thread is a thread, but there is no deal here.
We can give picks to TOR, Garland to UTA, OG to CLE ?
 
Back
Top