What's new

David Locke - Utah Jazz are NOT tanking


ONE LOVE

#Baby_Talk
Staff member
Posted this in the tank thread but feel it deserves its own thread. Video below. He is responding to Andy Larsen's article that the Jazz had started tanking.

Locke's reasoning for why he believes we're NOT taking starts at 13 min. mark.


View: https://youtu.be/Jg5KWsxzCM0


Thoughts?

I just keep rolling my eyes back and back and back.. and they did a full 180.

His reasoning for why we're NOT tanking were:

- that the Org's message had always been that we're not tanking

- we needed to play Dok and Juzang to see what they've got going forward

Here's my question:

Would a team hunting for playoffs spot and guaranteed seeding trade away Conley, Vando and Beasely just as we enter the playoff race?

Do we see any other teams chasing playoff spot in the League trade away 3 starters at the trade deadline?

And we ended up playing the likes of Juzang 15 minutes last night?

C'mon now..

I watch Locke sometimes for ***** and giggles and some small nuggets of insight, but this was just too much for me to handle to be honest witchu.
 


Posted this in the tank thread but feel it deserves its own thread. Video below. He is responding to Andy Larsen's article that the Jazz had started tanking.

Locke's reasoning for why he believes we're NOT taking starts at 13 min. mark.


View: https://youtu.be/Jg5KWsxzCM0


Thoughts?

I just keep rolling my eyes back and back and back.. and they did a full 180.

His reasoning for why we're NOT tanking were:

- that the Org's message had always been that we're not tanking

- we needed to play Dok and Juzang to see what they've got going forward

Here's my question:

Would a team hunting for playoffs spot and guaranteed seeding trade away Conley, Vando and Beasely just as we enter the playoff race?

Do we see any other teams chasing playoff spot in the League trade away 3 starters at the trade deadline?

And we ended up playing the likes of Juzang 15 minutes last night?

C'mon now..

I watch Locke sometimes for ***** and giggles and some small nuggets of insight, but this was just too much for me to handle to be honest witchu.

I think there's a third option. I think it's truthful (to an extent) that they can say they're not tanking and shooting for the playoffs. They probably have fish's "everything is a win" approach. They'd like to see the team do well, but they're not putting anything into it to make the team do well, and they're not going to not make a move that's better in the long-run because it compromises this year. In that sense, they may have seen opportunity in the Lakers move and didn't see parlaying those guys into other long-term assets as being as feasible down the road. They may be in the camp of "if it happens, it happens." This way they can also truthfully answer questions pertaining to any side of this issue.
 
I think they are rebuilding. DA has rebuilt through young assets and draft capital. A tank is an effort to get as many high picks as possible and let them develop at all costs with blatant disregard to all other considerations.

I don't think DA is hyperfocused on winning or losing this year. I think he is focused on maximizing each opportunity to the end goal of a championship.

I think recent moves were what he saw as the best value he would get and it was the sell high moment. I also see an added benefit of increasing the value of our own pick.

Sent from my SM-G996U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Locke is right but his reasoning is wrong.
We just gutted the team enough so if some our starters will be out - winning is hard.
Then again if JC and Collin could be in most of these games for the rest of the season and we make it to the post-season - then fine. In that case the core is deserving it.
Starters are not intentionally sat in the bench for extended minutes. So no tanking.

The goal was clearly improve odds for the lottery ticket without an active tanking in game time decisions.
 
A tank is an effort to get as many high picks as possible and let them develop at all costs with blatant disregard to all other considerations.
I just want to say that I dont think this has actually ever happened in the history of the nba.
 
Locke would not say or do anything that wasn't what the organization wanted him to say or do.

His job is to carry water for the franchise.
I really dont think the franchise tells him what to say. Of course Locke is going to have a favorable opinion, but his spins are generally respectable and not blatant homerism.
 


Top