//r00t 4 Jazz
Well-Known Member
Of course this current record/playoff seeding Sloany is referring to has absolutely nothing to do with the change of wing players in the off season (and no Memo).
Good point on Booz's first 2yrs on the team.Is would have been my answer also Sloanfeld. I don't think we have had the time to see if this combo is better or worse than the one with Boozer. And we wont be able to see than for sure until they play together for a few years. The Jazz had a .500 record with Boozer, Deron and Memo there first year. The next year they came back and had a good one.
Of course this current record/playoff seeding Sloany is referring to has absolutely nothing to do with the change of wing players in the off season (and no Memo).
Exactly. To him it's all about Boozer. But losing Mathews and Memo has hurt far more than changing Boozer out for Al.
Deron/Memo/Boozer.
Memo's ability to stretch the floor opened up the lane for everyone - from Deron to Boozer to Brewer (52% shooter off dunks and layups).
Boozer's pick-and-roll ability gave Deron a myriad of options coming off the screen and got Memo alot of open looks from deep. Both Memo and Boozer were great passers from both the high-post and low-post - which allowed Utah's offense to flow beautifully. Memo/Boozer were vastly superior offensively to the Al/Sap combo - and I think that offensive difference is larger than the defensive advantage Sap/Al have. Memo was also one of the more clutch players in recent Jazz history, and Boozer had several clutch moments in the playoffs as well.
The big advantage I give Sap&Al is their ability to stay healthy - because 2/3 years they faced the Lakers Memo was hurt - although the one year Utah did face the Lakers at full-strength they were one shot and an LA ref screwjob away from winning that series.
If Al learns to pass and Millsap can prove to be a starter w/out wearing down midway through the season then maybe in a few years things change - but until that happens I'd give Boozer/Memo the advantage.
You mad?