What's new
By:

Does Lauri Get Traded?

Does Lauri Get Dealt Before The Season Starts?

  • Total voters
    134
  • Poll closed .
Elizah Huge said:
No they are going to go all-in for Lauri to make a push at being a contender in Steph’s and Draymond’s last years.
Click to expand...
The post I responded to was talking about alternatives for if they didn't go all in for Lauri doe
I was told that the only alternative was to waste Currys final years. I just pointed out that there was another alternative.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Think the smart move for them is what they are currently doing. Spend as much money as possible without spending future assets. Give Steph a last hurrah then trade him the following year out of nowhere and move on
Click to expand...
But in the meantime... act like you are trying to get Lauri so you trigger a bidding war and make the Spurs give us all their picks! Smart!
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
#tonewatch

It was a 3% chance to start the offseason... then when Bridges happened and we missed out it was a 10%... then **** got real and it was a 60%... currently it is a 45% based on Tony's article yesterday and other interviews... it feels like a pure coin toss so I will say 40-45% because a trade involves two parties agreeing. I think the extension is likely Lauri's preference and this exercise may be helpful for us to get his market value and also relay what we are going to do before he signs... so he doesn't feel cheated.
Click to expand...
#tonewatch... that's like #leveragewatch... but sounds more sinister.
 
Rubashov said:
Just what do GSW have to offer that we would want?
Click to expand...
OIP.IWgVkfn6E3NEftV0zfMwjwAAAA
 
None of them make us better just more broken toys. Unless its a top 5 pick who cares? Eh...
 
I'm not the biggest fan of Kuminga. I get that he's athletic and has some defensive presence, but he's not much of a shooter or ball-mover, and he doesn't even seem to be that great off-ball slasher either. He's okay near the basket, but I think he's been more sizzle than steak so far.
 
Ferguson_Mellochill said:
I'm not the biggest fan of Kuminga. I get that he's athletic and has some defensive presence, but he's not much of a shooter or ball-mover, and he doesn't even seem to be that great off-ball slasher either. He's okay near the basket, but I think he's been more sizzle than steak so far.
Click to expand...
"so far" is the key there. he's only 21 and averaged an efficient 16 ppg and he has the size and athleticism every team covets. pretty good base to start from. there is a reason he's a deal breaker for gsw.

you can improve as a long range shooter and ball mover.
 
Last edited:
Rubashov said:
None of them make us better just more broken toys. Unless its a top 5 pick who cares? Eh...
Click to expand...
If you trade for a top 5 pick on draft night it costs too much... if you trade for a pick or infinity picks that turn into top 5 picks you get a ton of value. This is literally how Boston built its title team. Get someone else's picks because they yolo their picks... have enough other picks to fill in through trade.

We may have to have our own picks be the top 5 picks... which is why tanking is on the table. The other young players are helpful and you never know who turns into the next Lauri.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
If you trade for a top 5 pick on draft night it costs too much... if you trade for a pick or infinity picks that turn into top 5 picks you get a ton of value. This is literally how Boston built its title team. Get someone else's picks because they yolo their picks... have enough other picks to fill in through trade.

We may have to have our own picks be the top 5 picks... which is why tanking is on the table. The other young players are helpful and you never know who turns into the next Lauri.
Click to expand...

It doesn't really grab my imagination as a fan tho.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top