What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Well, that is impressively serious documented qualifications.

I know you have said before you're not the wholesale political partisan exactly. I don't know why your comments strike me as that consistently committed to the general attitude I see as "progressive". Certainly, your comments on the subject of guns and second amendment are indeed on a higher level of discourse.

I get it that a lot of moralistic conservatives consider Trump a sort of libertine and fake conservative, and the idea of having someone from a moronic TV program, a sales-pitcher on "The Art of the Deal" and real estate shenanigans becoming POTUS might well be a shock.....

And I get it that a lot of fairly innocent Americans with no strong political ideas could see his behavior as disturbing in some respects, too.....

But I think Trump got elected fair and square, and I think Americans.... whatever their opinions.... should pitch in and help make things work better in this country. I am impressed that Trump is actually "practical" more than "partisan". That means he would listen to you if you could only make good sense to him. Write him a letter. Be nice, but tell him why you are concerned about the stuff that makes you angry.

I probably won't ever show up at a poker game or beer party, but I would think it a fine thing to meet you on a range, say with two of my brothers-in-law who are actually expert with guns, but probably could learn a few things from you.

We know exactly what your thinking gets us. A state of tinfoil hats and blame games.

GTFO.
 
It’s difficult to understand what this thread is talking about over the past few pages with so many ignored posters posting and weirdo rants being made.

So let me see if I understand this correctly:

“Some on the right think that Clinton actually colluded with Russia over the last election and that’s why she needs to be investigated?”

Huh?

Why? What would the motive be since it’s pretty common knowledge that Putin didn’t want to see a Clinton presidency.

Furthermore, what proof does anyone have? The uranium one deal allowing a russian company to buy uranium from Canada (which must stay in North America) which was signed off by a dozen agencies all unaffiliated with the Clintons?

Why would Russia need uranium one to provide them
With nukes? We understand that Russia is still #1 in nuclear weapon stockpiles, right? So investing in a high risk low reward operation to provide them with materials to make weapons that they already have an abundance of makes zero sense.

I think a More probable explanation is that russian colluded with the trump team to promote trump’s pro Russian oligarchy agenda and strike down the Magnitsky Act which has frozen Putin’s assets. Oh, and to also create divisions between Americans and the West.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yeah I didn’t see it. Trying to type on a phone lying in a couch recovering from tonsillectomy leads to some bad typos. I just spelled “create” instead. There are probably several other typos but whatever.
 
Funny reading these threads with people on ignore.

Well, that would be the way you read any thread even without an "ignore" function built in on the computer. In fact, a lot of folks basically live life being just that concerned, in that exact way, with others.
 
We know exactly what your thinking gets us. A state of tinfoil hats and blame games.

GTFO.

ha ha.

why is it that liberals have to project their own foibles on the right?

Few political ideologues have ever been as out of touch with reality as Karl Marx.

So some smug little Brit intellectual, in the 1840s or 1850s, still frothing at the prospect of an American Revolution gone viral..... just using that modern term as descriptive of the panic that must have been quietly disrupting Brit oligarchs/nobles with their stiff upper lips but more than one teardrop in their tea....obsessing about the evils of world fallen into the hands of the commoners...... finally came up with a sort of plan. And paid Marx to sketch the outlines of a faux populist word utopia susceptible to the expert manipulations only the Brits could ever manage. Fake American ideals crafted for real Brit Imperialism.

I found the plan clearly laid out in "The Importance of Being Earnest", a play by Oscar Wilde. You should check it out.

It's all about the political benefits of appearing to be what you're not. That is the essence of Marxism. Marxism has never really been about an idyllic utopian world managed by the proletariat, but about a few clever political manipulators capable of creating that illusion, just enough that the American trailer trash and third-world cardboard-box squatters will let them do things as they know they should do them.

Marxist "believers" and in general todays "progressives"... not at all intending any insult to any insurance company or salesman.... are the tinfoil hat people. Really. They prattle on and on about fantastic ideals while they let the oligarchs, the fascists, the moneyed elite bourgeoisie with their well-qualified college-indoctrinated plantation managers treat the tinfoil hat believers in a better world through professional management.... like Red and Thriller....., right along with the rest of us, all like slaves. Well, like "natives".

That would be, like the barbarians, to the nobles.

and hey, did you hear? Prince Phillip the longtime sniveling consort to Queen Elizabeth, has finally become so demented the Queen has decided to keep him hidden in some Windsor closet now.
 
Last edited:
“He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative.” -G.K. Chesterton

Trout cannot help that at all. And yes, I am "an eternal rebel" indeed. Whatever Trump decides to do to disrupt the status quo, poking sticks at the alligators in the Federal swamps, I will honor him all the more by being a rebel against his doings.
 
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/20...w-in-january-flynn-probably-violated-the-law/

They knew Flynn's actions back in January. Even researched it. Didn't prosecute, didn't alert anybody.

Trump fired Flynn while still organizing his team, around Dec. 1. For lying to Pence.

Flynn was a concern to me even before then.... during the campaign, actually.... because he was a "team player" and one of Obama's team. Never trusted Flynn. He's a UN hack, faux American. Our military is pretty much "weaponized" politically by the left, and Trump's reliance on his "generals" who've been indoctrinated in the model of the UN (Brit Imperialist) kind of world management that Lord Cecil Rhodes saw... at the outset of the "progressive" era, as the only practical way to manage the world in a truly "white" way.

Fascism all dressed up in democratic garbage.
 
Back
Top