What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
The problem is trumpism is rooted in centuries of institutionalized racism and white privilege, and it represents those who rely on this, even if they don't know it, slowly losing their power as things equal out like we've never seen before. Trumpism was just a rallying cry that came at the right time, and we see that the more they even just "hint" at white supremacy, the stronger their base supports them. So the symbol might change, but we will feel the extinction burst of these long-held biases for years if not decades until it equalizes, if it ever does. Frankly this might lead to some kind of civil war, even if it's fought in the form of protests and counter-protests that turn violent and in increased mass shootings and even neighborhood shootings like the guy that was on a jog who got shot for being in the wrong neighborhood. The point is, the people that Trump energized won't go away just because Trump does. They will use him as a martyr and their next leader will be even more blatant to tie into that energy. It has always been there, bubbling just barely beneath the surface, and it was contained as long as there were outlets, like segregation and redlining. Now that these things are being stripped away, it's starting to erupt. A social Kilauea. And if it pops for real it could be devastating. And Trump was really just the tip of the iceberg.
Good post.

I do think the GOP or a conservative Party will need to emerge that isn’t completely based on establishing/maintaining white Christian hierarchy. And if they dont? Normal people can keep that party out of power. We failed in 2016. But we’ve done a pretty good job since. Even the 2022 midterms became a red trickle instead of what should’ve been a red tsunami.

TBH, I also have strong doubts about whether we get out of this with a multicultural democracy. I think we’re already seeing a soft civil war. I think we have a lot of rich and powerful white people who like the current hierarchy. They benefit by convincing others that blacks and immigrants are causing problems for the working class rather than they. It’s much easier to control the “proles” when they’re attacking each other. And there are a lot of bored middle class people who see their purpose in life being bully of LGBTs and banning books. It’s “fun” to act your worst and wave that “**** Biden” flag at your neighbor who has a gay son. It’s relieving to blow off civility. It’s easier to bully school boards, scream at doctors, and spit on cashiers rather than act like a rational adult. Social media helps people think this behavior is normal and it helps these apes organize and find each other. Just like we see with “Moms of Liberty” and other MAGA groups.
 
Yeah social media is definitely the accelerant in this dumpster fire, like thermite. It's a social disinhibitor, making people believe that acting like a **** is socially acceptable and what used to be confined to ****** message boards is now just how we treat each other thanks to the cancerous sites like Facebook and Instagram and worst of all, Twitter.
 
Yeah social media is definitely the accelerant in this dumpster fire, like thermite. It's a social disinhibitor, making people believe that acting like a **** is socially acceptable and what used to be confined to ****** message boards is now just how we treat each other thanks to the cancerous sites like Facebook and Instagram and worst of all, Twitter.
People used to have to get drunk to give their self an excuse to say horrible **** to other people, now they just need a twitter account.
 
Last edited:
People used to have to get drunk to give their self an excuse to say horrible **** to other people, now they just need a twitter account.
And now your crazy *** uncle isn’t just ranting at Thanksgiving. He’s leading large groups of like minded “patriots” sharing Trump Rambo memes and planning protests as local school boards on social media. I went to high school with this nut job
IMG_9041.png
IMG_9042.png
IMG_9043.png
IMG_9044.png
****ing nuts. So many grown *** adults acting their worst.
 
What I don't get is what Trump was doing with these documents anyway? My assumption is that presidents generally aren't directly involved in the nitty-gritty of diplomacy, foreign policy, nuclear capabilities(they have a cabinet and advisors for a reason), so I have a very hard time believing that a semi-literate Trump was sitting on the toilet going through hoards of intelligence reports.
Yep, that’s my question. Why did he need all those docs on nuclear matters, and military capabilities of the US and others? What the hell is going on? What, if anything, was he planning to do with those docs and the information in those docs? What was/is Donald Trump up to?
 
“The federal criminal case against Donald Trump for mishandling classified documents will be overseen, at least initially, by Judge Aileen Cannon, according to the New York Times. This is excellent news for Trump and exceedingly bad news for special counsel Jack Smith. Cannon’s total lack of principle, combined with her evident incapacity to experience shame, renders her a uniquely favorable jurist for the former president. Indeed, if she maintains her grasp on this case, it is nearly impossible to envision Smith securing a conviction in her courtroom.”

 
Last edited:
Yep, that’s my question. Why did he need all those docs on nuclear matters, and military capabilities of the US and others? What the hell is going on? What, if anything, was he planning to do with those docs and the information in those docs? What was/is Donald Trump up to?
Well you know the old saying, it's better have classified documents and not need them than to need classified documents and not have them.
 
“The federal criminal case against Donald Trump for mishandling classified documents will be overseen, at least initially, by Judge Aileen Cannon, according to the New York Times. This is excellent news for Trump and exceedingly bad news for special counsel Jack Smith. Cannon’s total lack of principle, combined with her evident incapacity to experience shame, renders her a uniquely favorable jurist for the former president. Indeed, if she maintains her grasp on this case, it is nearly impossible to envision Smith securing a conviction in her courtroom.”

Doesn't a jury decide on his guilt rather than a judge?
 
Back
Top