Do I have data? Sure. See the entire history of the world versus America and it's constitutional republic 1776 to now.
That’s not data
Do I have data? Sure. See the entire history of the world versus America and it's constitutional republic 1776 to now.
Do I have data? Sure. See the entire history of the world versus America and it's constitutional republic 1776 to now.
Democracy isn't an alternative to tyranny.
lol wut? Why’s he so obsessed with batteries these days? Sharks I get, they remind him of Stormy. Didn’t they watch some Shark documentary after she spanked his ***? But what’s this obsession about batteries?
Man, I know Biden is old and has a stutter. But this is just incoherent gibberish. If any of your family members sounded like this, the last thing you’d do is put them in charge of anything. You’d be seeking a nursing home or hospice. Instead, the GOP thinks you’re stupid enough to put this rapist and felon into the White House.
View: https://x.com/acyn/status/1802103783817982306?s=46
Data is simply another word for information. Just because you don’t like particular information or it falsifies your preheld beliefs doesn’t mean it isn’t information.That’s not data
We are not a democracy. We are a republic and prior to about 15 years ago that wasn't a controversial statement. "I pledge allegiance to the flag ... and to the republic for which it stands..."Please don’t tell me you are one of those guys who says we’re not a democracy but rather a republic. Clearly we are both.
Agreed on this clip he brought up a salient topic. But to be fair you ignored the other clips where he does sound like a lunatic. But both parties have the same problem in varying degrees, they are trying to get us to elect a geriatric senior who should be telling his great grandchildren rambling stories. Not using those rambling stories to govern the greatest country in the free world. We are so ****ed.This is what you consider “incoherent gibberish”?
You complain about conservatives not coming on here and debating policies and ideas. Trump is doing that in this clip. It’s not hard to follow along. He is ripping the idea of having electric tanks because of weather, distance, weight and size while trying to make a couple of jokes.
I would debate you on this subject right now. I’m not for electric tanks at all, not until there is much more improvement in battery technology. I agree with him on all these factors.
Just because Trump says something, your opinion will be the complete opposite. Your response to this idea that diesel tanks are better than electric tanks is put the person who thinks diesel is better into nursing homes or hospice.
You didn’t even debate the factors he brought up. You could have went with it would reduce the cost (human and moving) of logistics of diesel in war zones. Or could have went with a hybrid solution.
If you want to debate, don’t use MAGA, Trump or any other scary right wing word. Just debate on facts or the context of what the other person is saying.
I want to point this out because you’ve fooled a few on here to think that you’re not a MAGA trumper but a rational conservative. I don’t see it that way at all. You could prove me wrong. Conservatives actually have principles. A few valid points:This is what you consider “incoherent gibberish”?
You complain about conservatives not coming on here and debating policies and ideas. Trump is doing that in this clip. It’s not hard to follow along. He is ripping the idea of having electric tanks because of weather, distance, weight and size while trying to make a couple of jokes.
I would debate you on this subject right now. I’m not for electric tanks at all, not until there is much more improvement in battery technology. I agree with him on all these factors.
Just because Trump says something, your opinion will be the complete opposite. Your response to this idea that diesel tanks are better than electric tanks is put the person who thinks diesel is better into nursing homes or hospice.
You didn’t even debate the factors he brought up. You could have went with it would reduce the cost (human and moving) of logistics of diesel in war zones. Or could have went with a hybrid solution.
If you want to debate, don’t use MAGA, Trump or any other scary right wing word. Just debate on facts or the context of what the other person is saying.
We don’t need to pick out one clip out of… I don’t know how many collectively we’ve posted over the last few days, to defend Trump. Why didn’t he address the deportation clip? Or Ronny Johnson? Dementia anyone? Or the shark and batteries one from a few days back?Agreed on this clip he brought up a salient topic. But to be fair you ignored the other clips where he does sound like a lunatic. But both parties have the same problem in varying degrees, they are trying to get us to elect a geriatric senior who should be telling his great grandchildren rambling stories. Not using those rambling stories to govern the greatest country in the free world. We are so ****ed.
Don’t worry, I’ll bring up the rest after I get to my destination. Costa Vida before DIA. On a college recruiting trip for my daughter.I want to point this out because you’ve fooled a few on here to think that you’re not a MAGA trumper but a rational conservative. I don’t see it that way at all. And this is yet another example of it. A few valid points:
1. Out of all those clips you pick this one out to try and debate. As if those other clips aren’t bad. As if they don’t exist. Whether it’s deporting 10 people while accidentally deporting the one legal person here or letting Ukraine be killed off by Trump’s buddy, Putin. I notice you didn’t address Trump’s sharks and batteries clip or Ronny “Johnson” clip. Why?
2. Something both you and AL do a lot of and it’s dishonest, is remove context. This isn’t the first time Trump has rifted about electric tanks. Having non-tactical hybrid vehicles on base for transportation doesn’t sound like a bad idea. Yet, Trump exaggerates and lies, and makes it sound like our “woke military that loves LGBTs and blacks is now selling out our security for electric battle tanks while other less woke militaries continue to use good old fashioned manly fossil fuel powered tanks. Libs are weak impotent green queers!” There’s valuable MAGA context here that fuels his populism (fascism tbh). He’s not debating the merits of hybrid or electric powered vehicles. He’s using this as yet another point in his culture war. He’s creating a narrative that “MAGA strong people use fossil fuels while the other side uses dumb impotent wimpy unrealistic forms of energy. And I bet they also use vaccines, love gays, use wimpy shower heads, are black, etc.”
3. You don’t have to defend Trump here. There was a time when Republicans believe in climate change and didn’t make it a culture issue (John McCain actually made it a big part of his campaign In 2008). Where have all the conservatives gone? Have they all joined the Democratic coalition or MAGA?
Trump's False Claim That U.S. Military Moving to Electric Tanks - FactCheck.org
The military is moving toward the electrification of its vehicle fleets. It's not, as former President Donald Trump falsely claims, going "to make our great Army tanks all-electric."www.factcheck.org
Hope your trip goes well, but Costa Vida?View attachment 16533Don’t worry, I’ll bring up the rest after I get to my destination. Costa Vida before DIA. On a college recruiting trip for my daughter.
Hope your trip goes well, but Costa Vida?
Not too far from there is the greatest restaurant in the world.
Do you think that the military will intentionally build tanks that don't work? If so, why do you think they would/will do that?This is what you consider “incoherent gibberish”?
You complain about conservatives not coming on here and debating policies and ideas. Trump is doing that in this clip. It’s not hard to follow along. He is ripping the idea of having electric tanks because of weather, distance, weight and size while trying to make a couple of jokes.
I would debate you on this subject right now. I’m not for electric tanks at all, not until there is much more improvement in battery technology. I agree with him on all these factors.
Just because Trump says something, your opinion will be the complete opposite. Your response to this idea that diesel tanks are better than electric tanks is put the person who thinks diesel is better into nursing homes or hospice.
You didn’t even debate the factors he brought up. You could have went with it would reduce the cost (human and moving) of logistics of diesel in war zones. Or could have went with a hybrid solution.
If you want to debate, don’t use MAGA, Trump or any other scary right wing word. Just debate on facts or the context of what the other person is saying.
Because they so wokeDo you think that the military will intentionally build tanks that don't work? If so, why do you think they would/will do that?
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
When did I say that the military would make tanks that don’t work?Do you think that the military will intentionally build tanks that don't work? If so, why do you think they would/will do that?
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
The US military has previously become enamored with supposed advancements and gone all in only to realize afterwards it was a bad idea. One example is the gun that could shoot either 152mm rounds or Shillelagh missiles. They designed both the M551 Sheridan and the M60A2 Main Battle Tank around that gun. The problem is in using the gun to fire the missile fouled the barrel so the 152mm rounds couldn't be fired, and firing the 152mm rounds cracked the barrel making the vehicle useless. The military actually phased out the M60A2 in 1976 to go back to the older M60A1 until 1980 when the M1 Abrahams took over.Do you think that the military will intentionally build tanks that don't work? If so, why do you think they would/will do that?
Ding ding ding!Because they so woke
Give us the manly man Russian military. They so manly that they just rush into battle out from any kind of cover and get annihilated because if they don't their own leadership shoots them.
Electric tanks aren’t in war zones. Someone don’t read the link I sent but they are buying the nonsense Trump spouted. Why would the military develop such ineffective tanks @Bucknutz? You have yet to answer this simple question that @fishonjazz asked.When did I say that the military would make tanks that don’t work?
In a war zone, with the technology we have now, would you rather have diesel or electric tanks?
How less efficient is the electric tank in sub temperatures compared to diesel tanks?
In an emergency, both need to refuel or recharge, which one is quicker?
When did I say that the military would make tanks that don’t work?
In a war zone, with the technology we have now, would you rather have diesel or electric tanks?
How less efficient is the electric tank in sub temperatures compared to diesel tanks?
Again no one said they are in a war zone. It’s a hypothetical question asking if they were which one would you choose?Electric tanks aren’t in war zones. Someone don’t read the link I sent but they are buying the nonsense Trump spouted.