What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
So they carried all those boxes inside and then carried them out again? If only there was footage, like a camera the police could wear on their uniform...

This is a lie intended to only be taken seriously by stupid people, which is Trump's base, so, it's probably going to work as intended.
 
This is a key point


View: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1557045330776137734?s=21&t=NLCDdzkCvuRBhcgDqpQETQ
And it’s not like this was the first time he’d ****ed around with this. For the past two years he’s been mishandling classified documents. Read my post a page or so back. This has been a continual habit of his. I think there’s some real suspicion that he was selling state secrets.

Would it really surprise anyone if he was doing this???
 
So they carried all those boxes inside and then carried them out again? If only there was footage, like a camera the police could wear on their uniform...

This is a lie intended to only be taken seriously by stupid people, which is Trump's base, so, it's probably going to work as intended.
Exactly.

It also makes zero sense for the Democratic controlled “deep state” to do this right now. Who’s talking about the low inflation numbers or great legislation recently passed? Now all the reporting is back on Trump and how his followers have their feelings hurt (I swear to god they can’t go more than 5 hrs without having their feelings hurt over something)
 
So they carried all those boxes inside and then carried them out again? If only there was footage, like a camera the police could wear on their uniform...

This is a lie intended to only be taken seriously by stupid people, which is Trump's base, so, it's probably going to work as intended.
They would just claim the video footage was falsified. This is the King of Fake News we are talking about, the Great Orange Hope. They could have Trump on there himself handing **** over to the FBI and they would find a way to twist it. The news is what they say it is. Nothing is reported anymore, it is all spin.

I mean it is kind of crazy. Spin has always been a problem in reporting, primarily in the form of bias that inadvertently made its way into the reporting. Sometimes spun on purpose. But I do not think I have seen a time when the spin is so blatant and so heavily obviously false to be nothing short of full-on gaslighting.

Reporter: "Sir we have video of you shooting that man."
Politician: "No you don't."
Politician's Lawyer: "The shooting did not occur. We have evidence that the man was already shot when he arrived. The video purporting to show my client saying 'die die die' while pulling the trigger was a deep fake intended to make him look guilty. It is a plot by q-anon to discredit my client."
Reporter: "It has surfaced on multiple social media sites from 20 different people who filmed it."
Politician: "No it hasn't."
Lawyer: "No it hasn't. Those were crisis actors paid for by q-anon."
Average citizen: "****ing q-anon again. They need to all be killed!"

It is ridiculous in the extreme this is the world we live in now.
 

He is just following the best advice when speaking to any law enforcement authority: don't say anything. That is frankly what everyone should do. It is the advice of every single lawyer in the world. When interrogated, clam up and don't give them more rope to hang you. That is just common sense. The whole "you would talk if you didn't have anything to hide" is complete ******** and is exactly what cops say to get you to say things they can then use to incriminate you. Best advice in dealing with law enforcement: shut the **** up.
 
With Hillary, I think the issue is more the obvious difference in the way the FBI has apparently reacted to recovering materials. With Trump they very publicly rolled up to his house with 30 squad cars and tore though the place while nothing remotely like that happened with Hillary. There appears to be a bias in the way the FBI handles democrats versus how they handle republicans.
I'm sure it had nothing at all to do with Clinton turning over her server's hard drives while Trump hid the classified documents away. It must be bias. No other explanation.[/sarcasm]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
By this logic Trump would also be innocent since they have investigated him but not filed charges. So should we just let his stuff slide as well?
Legally, Trump is innocent. If what you mean by "let him slide" is to vote for him in 2024, I would happily agree that no one should vote for Clinton in 2024, and no one should vote for Trump.

I’m not a supporter but if Trump is gonna go down then why not Hillary? Why not treat the crime the same?
One is a person's team deliberately removing classified papers to a non-classified location; the other is a few hundred people sending emails where the classified information was buried by top-posting. If you prosecute Clinton, you have to prosecute half of Congress, most of the State Department, and a sizable chunk of the Obama administration (if not, I guarantee you that they will all be on Clinton's witness list). Politically, the second is just not feasible.

I don't see the offenses as largely the same, with the first being done deliberately, the second in ignorance. I am not saying we need to prosecute Trump for this; the DoJ will sort that out.

It’s political warfare.
If anything, Trump got the kid-gloves treatment from the FBI on this search.

We all know it. Corruption from both parties is killing those who live in this country. It’s not about us anymore. It’s about political power. The money that is laundered is astronomical. Billions.
It's always been about political power and corruption, from the time the Articles of Confederation were drafted. That's human nature.
 
Also, why wasn’t swalwell investigated and raided for having an affair with a Chinese spy? Why isn’t anyone associated with Epstein being raided…well maybe trump is now
  • Even though U.S. officials do not believe Fang received or passed on classified information, the case "was a big deal, because there were some really, really sensitive people that were caught up" in the intelligence network, a current senior U.S. intelligence official said.
No classified information to retrieve.
 
He is just following the best advice when speaking to any law enforcement authority: don't say anything. That is frankly what everyone should do. It is the advice of every single lawyer in the world. When interrogated, clam up and don't give them more rope to hang you. That is just common sense. The whole "you would talk if you didn't have anything to hide" is complete ******** and is exactly what cops say to get you to say things they can then use to incriminate you. Best advice in dealing with law enforcement: shut the **** up.
He’s not pleading the 5th to cops. He’s pleading the 5th to the AG during a civil lawsuit, right? Is that normal?

Didn’t Trump say that you only plead the 5th if you’re guilty?
 
He’s not pleading the 5th to cops. He’s pleading the 5th to the AG during a civil lawsuit, right? Is that normal?

Didn’t Trump say that you only plead the 5th if you’re guilty?
I would plead the 5th to anything and everything. You can assume all you want. To me it is just a good practice in those situations. The more you say the more you have to resort to "it depends on what the definition of 'is' is" kind of **** to defend yourself.
 
The problem with this argument is that it doesn't apply to presidents because the president has the broad and unquestioned powers to declassify anything at any time without any process.
Then Trump would have a defense that the material is not classified, because he went through the process of de-classification. Unless he failed to do that ...

... which is why what Hillary did was so much worse.
Funny how conservatives keep saying "Clinton", and ignoring all the people in Congress who sent her emails.
 
Back
Top