What's new

Don't Ask, Don't Tell is officially history!!

exactly. if you had simply said this all along, nobody would have questioned you.

they choose, and the rest of us, as human beings, should be tolerant and i would take it a step further and say supportive of their quest for what is nothing more than true happiness. after all, isn't that what we all want in life?

i never said i hate gays or they should not be gay.
i said gays should not be in the army.
so someone replied by back in the day african americans were not allowed in the army
so i came back with being african american isnt a choice being gay is. i also stated i would be okay to grab a beer with a gay person, chill or relax with a gay person. but i would not go to war with one. because imho they are Weak(maybe its not the correct word. weak minded, mentally unstable or whatever). i just have a feeling i am misunderstood

if you chose to be gay power to you. just dont be a wus and blame it on genetics. if you choose to be an alcoholic dont blame it on it being a disease admit you are weak and lack self controll.

if i offended certain people allong the way, i'm sorry(yes katie i am sorry if i offended you). i received an infraction already because of this thread.
 
This message is to Dutch. I just received your neg rep. Yes, I know you can't prove it. There is no need to say, "I can't prove it." That is all.

okay maybe w can have that discussion another day/thread/pm. it's just one theory about the jfk assasination. to me it seems the most logical theory. there are a lot of theorys on jfks assisnation
 
834020_1241_625x1000.jpg
 
but why should gays not be in the military?

they have higher iq's than heterosexuals in every study i've seen.
they seem to frequent the gym and therefore be in better shape than your average heterosexual.
they're use to adverse conditions having had to live gay.
as another poster said, we've gotten by just fine with a co-ed workforce.

sorry, i wanted to go all dutch in style there. minus the numerous misspellings and grammatical errors that one usually finds in someone who's weaker-minded.
 
also one thing this might bring forth is something like affirmitave action.
when say a corporation has 2 many white people. and there is a new job opening so lets say a white guy comes in has far better qualification than the black person. because of affirmitave action the guy with less qualifications gets the job. thats just WRONG right.

now lats translate this to the army.
if certain units for example the navy seals, the delta force and maybe the amrines. have STRICT qualifications. so in the next 5 years no gays will be in those units. will the army be forced to lower the qualifications for gays, maybe, maybe not. lets hope not but with the stupidity of politicians you never know cus lifes are at stake in the army.
 
also one thing this might bring forth is something like affirmitave action.
when say a corporation has 2 many white people. and there is a new job opening so lets say a white guy comes in has far better qualification than the black person. because of affirmitave action the guy with less qualifications gets the job. thats just WRONG right.

now lats translate this to the army.
if certain units for example the navy seals, the delta force and maybe the amrines. have STRICT qualifications. so in the next 5 years no gays will be in those units. will the army be forced to lower the qualifications for gays, maybe, maybe not. lets hope not but with the stupidity of politicians you never know cus lifes are at stake in the army.

1emebig.jpg
 
also one thing this might bring forth is something like affirmitave action.
when say a corporation has 2 many white people. and there is a new job opening so lets say a white guy comes in has far better qualification than the black person. because of affirmitave action the guy with less qualifications gets the job. thats just WRONG right.

now lats translate this to the army.
if certain units for example the navy seals, the delta force and maybe the amrines. have STRICT qualifications. so in the next 5 years no gays will be in those units. will the army be forced to lower the qualifications for gays, maybe, maybe not. lets hope not but with the stupidity of politicians you never know cus lifes are at stake in the army.

Again, I don't really get it. Are you saying gay guys are less phsyically fit than straight guys? Because in general, that has not been my experience.
 
Back
Top