chemdude1232
Active Member
Shaq was surely dominant:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/o/onealsh01.html
Scroll down to the "Appearances on Leader Boards, Awards, and Honors" section and look at how often the "(1)" thing appears. That means he led the league that year in that particular category. I see quite a few of them.
Are his numbers in the range of Wilt Chamberlain or Kareem Abdul Jabbar? No. But - within the "era" in which he played - does he have dominant numbers? Absolutely.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/o/onealsh01.html
Scroll down to the "Appearances on Leader Boards, Awards, and Honors" section and look at how often the "(1)" thing appears. That means he led the league that year in that particular category. I see quite a few of them.
Are his numbers in the range of Wilt Chamberlain or Kareem Abdul Jabbar? No. But - within the "era" in which he played - does he have dominant numbers? Absolutely.