This is serious.
I love conspiracy theory threads, actually. Having one about trout is hilarious, but so far it is just inane. We have Colton reasoning that a troll seeking notoriety would eagerly claim the credits, and then. . . . an equally persuasive argument that anybody who would be a troll would not want to be outed. Impressive.
Nobody has accused me yet, and that is just no kind of right. And I am sure we have at least thirty would-be trouts in here, going all over the webz looking for a place to be a trout. Yes we have had the KY-trout joke already, that just means there are at least of million trolls in the universe who would think it fun to be KY-anything with a hole.
Doesn't anyone in here know the methods of Machiavelli?
Here, we have an ambitious little tyrant in Kingdom X fixated on running Kingdom Y as well. Machiavelli whispers in the ear of King X that he should select two. .. . well why not three. . . . or four. . . . . or more . . . . trusted little spies/sycophants/paid agitators/change-agent nutjobs, and send them into Kingdom Y to exploit some fermenting little social justice issue, working mobs up to rage in the streets, with King X controlling the narrative on all sides, until Queen Y is beyond her mental limits and cries for help. At which point, King X, with a gentlemanly smile, gallantly offers to "help". With Queen Y's adoring gratitude, King X marches his soldiers unopposed across the border to restore order.
While this methodology has been employed extensively, and adroitly, by many nations, none has surpassed the skill of the Brits. A very old movie I have on DVD,
Eagle in a Cage purports to document a Brit minister recruiting Napolean, offering to free him from St. Helena isle and bankroll a new army, just to keep Britains European rivals too busy to interfere with British commerce. Nowadays, the stage has been upgraded, and we have a whole new venue for the action in the UN, a virtual Brit reincarnation of the Empire with even greater glory in the offing.
But though mere trolls don't have such a vast stage, there is still the whole universe of the webz we can play with. . . . . .
So who is this dude on some unheard-of, faraway, alleged school sports forum? Who could possibly have invented a name like "trout" besides our own illustrious and unique intellect and site supergiant?
It is impossible. Nobody could do that. Can you imagine how many millions of knowing schemers would have to coordinate their efforts to achieve a duplicate troll?
