What's new

Earth and the Asteroid 02/15/13

https://www.cnn.com/2013/02/07/us/asteroid-approach-earth/index.html

where will you be? lets hope the caculations are all accuate lol. if not i here its headed for cinci.

alright, guy. You've seen pics of the Moon, right? Well, that's what the Earth would look like if we didn't have active atmospherics, wind, storms, rain, snow and stuff. . . . . which fill in or wash out our craters.

Still, geologists theorize that the Great Salt Lake is a former asteroid impact site, and there is one near the Drum Mountains about fifty miles southwest of the GSL, and quite a few others around our state. I see "falling stars" quite regularly, sometimes pretty spectacular, giving me wild notions about going over that hill and hiking around looking for a brand new hot rock or something. . . . .
 
alright, guy. You've seen pics of the Moon, right? Well, that's what the Earth would look like if we didn't have active atmospherics, wind, storms, rain, snow and stuff. . . . . which fill in or wash out our craters.

Still, geologists theorize that the Great Salt Lake is a former asteroid impact site, and there is one near the Drum Mountains about fifty miles southwest of the GSL, and quite a few others around our state. I see "falling stars" quite regularly, sometimes pretty spectacular, giving me wild notions about going over that hill and hiking around looking for a brand new hot rock or something. . . . .

^I don't know about that one.

Still, anyone seen "Melancholia"? Man, what a depressing movie! The end was cool though when *spoiler alert* everyone was huddled under the stick shelter (an homage to Plato's Cave) and Earth slams into the passing planet, effectively vaporizing life as we know it.
 
^I don't know about that one.

Still, anyone seen "Melancholia"? Man, what a depressing movie! The end was cool though when *spoiler alert* everyone was huddled under the stick shelter (an homage to Plato's Cave) and Earth slams into the passing planet, effectively vaporizing life as we know it.

OK, so I read it in probably the most thoroughly researched work on Utah geology, by Utah's foremost geologist. . . . but he was speculating on this point as the date of the meteor impacts was theoretically hundreds of millions of years ago, and the main evidence he had was the "rebound" uplift that is thought to occur over huge amounts of time after enormous impacts. . . .

for less controversial facts involving much more recent events, here's a good link:

https://geology.utah.gov/surveynotes/gladasked/gladmeteorites.htm
 
199231-asteroids-wallpaper.jpg
 
OK, so I read it in probably the most thoroughly researched work on Utah geology, by Utah's foremost geologist. . . . but he was speculating on this point as the date of the meteor impacts was theoretically hundreds of millions of years ago, and the main evidence he had was the "rebound" uplift that is thought to occur over huge amounts of time after enormous impacts. . . .

for less controversial facts involving much more recent events, here's a good link:

https://geology.utah.gov/surveynotes/gladasked/gladmeteorites.htm

Geology is a broad field with people, not unlike any other field, that have their strengths and weaknesses. Even though what you read may have said that meteor impacts created the Great Salt Lake, as a geologist, I just can't in good conscience read that and not refute it! By no means is this a poor reflection on you, there's a lot of weird literature out there. That said, my understanding is that the Great Salt Lake is actually just a remnant lake of a larger lake from the past called "Lake Bonneville". There's a long history that can be written about the Great Salt Lake, but long story short, it's just the most recent form of a lake that has varied widely in water volume.

If you want an interesting read about the GSL check out "Red Rock Pass" and the Bonneville Flood on wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonneville_Flood
 
Geology is a broad field with people, not unlike any other field, that have their strengths and weaknesses. Even though what you read may have said that meteor impacts created the Great Salt Lake, as a geologist, I just can't in good conscience read that and not refute it! By no means is this a poor reflection on you, there's a lot of weird literature out there. That said, my understanding is that the Great Salt Lake is actually just a remnant lake of a larger lake from the past called "Lake Bonneville". There's a long history that can be written about the Great Salt Lake, but long story short, it's just the most recent form of a lake that has varied widely in water volume.

If you want an interesting read about the GSL check out "Red Rock Pass" and the Bonneville Flood on wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonneville_Flood

although geology is not my strongst field of study, and I have not pursued a degree in it, it has been a lifelong interest. Well, at least since I was maybe two. . . . playing in the mud. Like weather, another favorite subject, it absorbs spare time whenever I have it.

Like the huge mysteries, such as the very deep margin between the Great Basin province and the Colorado Plateau, there are open questions about the Great Salt Lake depression which go far far into the past. During the Sevier Orogeny period. . .. comparatively recent in geologic terms, there was already a lake there, even though great rivers flowed eastward depositing incredible sediments in the basin which was where the Colorado Plateau now is. There were already the Uintah and Uncompaghre uplifts as well.

The features which raise the question about a possible vast meteoric crater where the lake now is involves mountain structures within the lake and particularly on its western edge. . . . where I have hiked extensively, noting faulting features which defy the usual basin/range block faulting seen elsewhere in the Great Basin. These features are disturbances in the very deep Cambrian through Pennsylvanian carbonate stratas, incompatible with the known thrust faulting of an earlier era. There is a notable anticline or dome structure to it, in broad terms thought to be an uplift resulting from local fracturing impact with resultant weakness in the crust. So, if you want to read about it, check out the comment in Geology of Utah by Stokes.

As you are probably aware, the incredible thicknesses of carbonates from the 500M to 200M yrs BP required shallow seas for their formation across that period, and the Great Salt Lake area is where those thicknesses are the greatest, suggesting it has long, long been for some reason a depression of some kind. So the question may still be open. . . .
 
Last edited:
although geology is not my strongst field of study, and I have not pursued a degree in it, it has been a lifelong interest. Well, at least since I was maybe two. . . . playing in the mud. Like weather, another favorite subject, it absorbs spare time whenever I have it.

Like the huge mysteries, such as the very deep margin between the Great Basin province and the Colorado Plateau, there are open questions about the Great Salt Lake depression which go far far into the past. During the Sevier Orogeny period. . .. comparatively recent in geologic terms, there was already a lake there, even though great rivers flowed eastward depositing incredible sediments in the basin which was where the Colorado Plateau now is. There were already the Uintah and Uncompaghre uplifts as well.

The features which raise the question about a possible vast meteoric crater where the lake now is involves mountain structures within the lake and particularly on its western edge. . . . where I have hiked extensively, noting faulting features which defy the usual basin/range block faulting seen elsewhere in the Great Basin. These features are disturbances in the very deep Cambrian through Pennsylvanian carbonate stratas, incompatible with the known thrust faulting of an earlier era. There is a notable anticline or dome structure to it, in broad terms thought to be an uplift resulting from local fracturing impact with resultant weakness in the crust. So, if you want to read about it, check out the comment in Geology of Utah by Stokes.

As you are probably aware, the incredible thicknesses of carbonates from the 500M to 200M yrs BP required shallow seas for their formation across that period, and the Great Salt Lake area is where those thicknesses are the greatest, suggesting it has long, long been for some reason a depression of some kind. So the question may still be open. . . .

Huh, that's interesting; I'll have to check it out! Thanks for the post and keep up the hikes and rock hunting. I've always enjoyed the outdoors a little more once I knew a thing or two about it... It's always good to hear from other geo-oriented types!
 
Back
Top