What's new

El Paso Shooting

Of course he knows, he is one.

Thats an obsurd statement. You have no evidence to back that up. And of course you dont. Why would you anyways. Its much easier to make **** up. You cant win with good ideas, so you slander the people you disagree with with lies. Its disgusting.
 
You know what "Allegedly" means right?

Clearly the left hasnt learned its lesson on being manipulated by the media. Even though we see countless times the news is reported inaccurately or untrue, you still keep on linking news reports as if we should take them at the word, and completely ignore bias.

I didn't say you had to take the report as true. You can post evidence that points to it not being true, if you have any to offer. I'm not stopping you. As I pointed out earlier in this thread(#789), this reluctance to even assign resources to white supremacy extremism was there before Trump:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/07/white-supremacist-terrorism-intelligence-analyst

You've always been free to dispute any report, posted by anyone, to this thread, or any thread. You're your own judge. But, certainly, at least feel free to point out why all this is more likely mistaken then not. And do so on it's merits, and not on the basis of the media sometimes making mistakes. That won't cut it. Establish information that calls this specific information into doubt. Or reinterpret it in some way favorable to your own world view. Maybe Hannity has some good spin on the specific story.
 
Thats an obsurd statement. You have no evidence to back that up. And of course you dont. Why would you anyways. Its much easier to make **** up. You cant win with good ideas, so you slander the people you disagree with with lies. Its disgusting.

No evidence? Here's just one example of WS rhetoric




To say nothing of his description of Iraqis as "semi literate" monkeys, while in the same breath extolling whites for "creating civilization." Nope, no white supremacy here, no sir.

 
Last edited:
It’s almost like each side is talking past each other based entirely on preconceived notions of who they are.

Talking past is an oversimplification. I think both sides want to lead their demographic and understand the importance of a clear message. Even if that message is disingenuous.

It's not like I've never done something similar. But I think I'm getting better... slowly... about recognizing that.

Bickering with @Archie Moses doesn't count, as he genuinely doesn't believe there's any other way to consider his stance other than it being the truth and nothing but the truth.
 
Back
Top