Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
AS a Kanter hater, I'll concede the Jazz mismanaged him in Year 2. But that was it.In what way? and be specific. I'm not interested in generalities.
Year 1: Enes as a rookie. Hadn't played college basketball, extremely raw. Strike shortened season, so short training camp. Enes plays in all 66 games and averages 13 mins/per. I'd say that was pretty fair.
Year 2: Enes stuck behing Big Al. Minutes only increase to 15/per. As said previously, Enes deserved more. Jazz were pushing for the playoffs and went with the veterans, so no trade of Al at the deadline. But watch Enes' footwork and moves. I think he benefitted GREATLY from working with Jefferson.
Year 3: Jazz made Enes the starter by not re-signing Jefferson. Sounds pretty fair to me. Enes was HORRIFIC on defense so he was moved back to a reserve. Then re-instated as a starter later in the year. Averaged just under 27 mins/per. Is that unfair?
Year 4: Again, Jazz show faith in Enes by having him start. Kanter is again a statue on defense. Enes grouses because Favors is getting more time and Gobert is starting to eat into his playing time. Averaged just over 27 mins with Utah before the trade. And 31 mins with OKC after the trade.
At OKC, he is allowed to just hang around the basket, no other responsibilities. At Utah, they wanted him to also be a threat from outside. I guess some could make a case for "mismanagement." He was also held accountable for his defense in Utah. Not so in OKC. Kanter wanted to be the focal point and for the team to be built around him and what HE wanted to do/not do. Still remember what Richard Jefferson said about him on the way out...and we were critical of RJ. But it was true, Kanter just doesn't think defense is important.