What's new

Eric Bolling should be fired from Faux NEws

Mission Accomplished

Well-Known Member
This is very racist and I don't care who you are you don't talk bad about a decent human being after their untimely death

[video]https://www.5min.com/Video/Eric-Bolling-Tells-Congresswoman-To-Step-Away-From-The-Crack-Pipe-517274323
 
This is very racist and I don't care who you are you don't talk bad about a decent human being after their untimely death

[video]https://www.5min.com/Video/Eric-Bolling-Tells-Congresswoman-To-Step-Away-From-The-Crack-Pipe-517274323

Racist? Maybe inappropriate but I'm not seeing the racist angle.

That having been said, Maxine Waters is bat crap crazy.
 
No way. That guy is hilarious. What we need to do is stop trying to censor everyone for making jokes or presenting information that we don't like.

Cenk Uygur should still be on MSNBC.
Beck should still be on Fox.
Lou Doubbs should still on CNN.
Juan Williams should still be on NPR.
Andrew Napolitano should still have his show.

etc.


The media is a ****ing joke because you can't say anything truthful, have your own views on events, or make any jokes without people getting butt hurt.
 
Using the reference of Crack pipe with an African American is very raciest


Saying that a black person is a crack head is not rascist. Blatantly false. Saying all black people are, well obviously it is.

edit: reminds me of a personal experience. A black man that I work with, and actually really liked, always yelled about crackers. Cracker this and cracker that. So to make a point one day I told a joke to him and a few other guys that we worked with. It had the offensive term for black people in it. Well he got mad and called me a rascist. I asked him how my joke is any worse then him saying craker 100 times a day. He had no answer and stormed off. Well all the other guys that were there (all black) told me I was right. I was. neither of us is or was rascist but we said a rascist term. OH NOES!!!123
 
For what? Having a view point that is contrary to yours?

They are for the right what, say..., MSNBC is for the left. Still a news agency. They are all biased.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl6ekkvWnOE

Nah, for being border line retarded.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl6ekkvWnOE

Nah, for being border line retarded.


So is some of the crap coming from the other news sites. My point is that if you do not like "faux news" do you hold the same standard for MSNBC, CNN, NPR, AFP...most people do not. Go watch the Maddow show on MSNBC...
 
So is some of the crap coming from the other news sites. My point is that if you do not like "faux news" do you hold the same standard for MSNBC, CNN, NPR, AFP...most people do not. Go watch the Maddow show on MSNBC...

I get most of my news from the internet. I don't watch MSNBC or CNN. Fox News is by far the most absurd. Or are you telling me The Muppets are brainwashing kids?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XzQL_Z2qLs&feature=related

This Eric Bolling guy is a genius.
 
I get most of my news from the internet. I don't watch MSNBC or CNN. Fox News is by far the most absurd. Or are you telling me The Muppets are brainwashing kids?

Keep twisting my responses to fit your needs. That is fine.

I am saying that Fox News has retarded crap. I never denied it. My point being is that so do the other "news" outlets. Just pick your flavor of bias. It is shown in what they do, and do not, cover and how they cover it.

So if you are going to complain about one complain about them all.
 
Keep twisting my responses to fit your needs. That is fine.

I am saying that Fox News has retarded crap. I never denied it. My point being is that so do the other "news" outlets. Just pick your flavor of bias. It is shown in what they do, and do not, cover and how they cover it.

So if you are going to complain about one complain about them all.

No on brought up that those new channels were better than Fox News. We are just proclaiming Fox News ****ing sucks. Why are you bringing up other news stations?

How am I twisting your words? I just asked a question.
 
No on brought up that those new channels were better than Fox News. We are just proclaiming Fox News ****ing sucks. Why are you bringing up other news stations?

How am I twisting your words? I just asked a question.

Last I checked we were talking about News chjannels and shows and not childrens programing. Pretty obvious.
 
Last I checked we were talking about News chjannels and shows and not childrens programing. Pretty obvious.

Nah, we were talking about Eric Bolling you twit. And that Muppets controversy was made up by Eric Bolling. Get with it.
 
Fox news bias is much worse than MSNBC, though most national news outlets carry far too much bias for reliable information sources. All about Al Jazeera, imo.
 
It's only racist if you want it to be...

Bolling is just another idiot on foxnews who thrives off playing emotions.

Just as we've seen on those youtube clips, "Captain Planet" and "Muppets" brainwashing kids... Or the accusations that somehow everyone other than "the right" is pointing the finger, hating capitalism, and that OWS was all about being jealous, not wanting to work, and hating capitalism.

That's... Not at all what people are upset about... They're upset about the system being screwed over to greatly favor a select few, superpacs/corporations buying legislation, and a completely unsustainable system that is deregulated and not bringing in revenue from ridiculously low tax rates. People are sick of hearing about how the rich need to have taxes low in order to create jobs, to only see them either not create jobs... Or create them in China.

The mindless tax cuts need to stop. If you want to keep your tax cuts, THEN CREATE JOBS HERE!!!

From what I've seen, most people upset and protesting aren't protesting against CAPITALISM. They're protesting against the corrupt crony capitalism that folks at foxnews want to promote under the disguise of "free market."
 
Fox news bias is much worse than MSNBC, though most national news outlets carry far too much bias for reliable information sources. All about Al Jazeera, imo.

The problem with Al Jazeera is that it's a British entity.

If I were to open a Duck Rodgers Academy and were teaching how to properly sift through government propaganda on controversial issues, I wouldn't say go read what the left side of the country says, and then go read what the right of the country says, and then come to your own conclusions. No, because their arguments are always rooted in government propaganda. The big secret is that enemies are often the best source of information for what's really happening when they aren't directly involved in the matter. If you want a fuller picture on US foreign/economic policy that doesn't involve China, read something from one of the "enemy" organs like Xinhua (China). Watch Press TV(Iran), watch Russian TV for US issues that don't directly involve those countries. If you want the scoop on what's going on in China outside of their direct beefs with Japan, read The Asahi Shimbun in Japan. As long as you can naturally skip over the self-serving bravado on whatever the current big issue of the day they're pumping is in those particular countries, it works great. And of course the mainstream US press will give you pretty decent views for issues we aren't directly involved in too at times and the Independent press does a good job on almost everything. It seems *** backwards, but we wouldn't have any need for an Independent press if these governments were as honest about themselves as they are about their enemies when it's an issue that doesn't directly involve them.
 
Last edited:
Or are you telling me The Muppets are brainwashing kids?

I'm telling you The Muppets are brainwashing kids and murdering those who dream of sheep in their sleep.

I'll take a wild guess that you've never seen 'The Muppets' or whatever reiteration of 'The Muppets' they're talking about, right? Neither have I. Haven't even heard of The Muppets since I was little kid, didn't even know they are still around. And Eric Bolling and his buddies on Fox probably haven't seen it either. But we both have probably seen media that is overly propagandistic presented in the context of T.V. shows or movies directed at children. Don't you think that deserves some circumspection, no matter the superficiality of it? Because, yes, really your brain does a lot of passive thinking and turns down a few notches when the boob tube is on, so you have to be careful with what you're consuming. Muppets or no Muppets. I mean, that's what this whole topic is about. It's a legitimate issue, whether you think so or not. And obviously, you think Fox News is propaganda, which it certainly is to those that just seep everything in at face value, but the same topic that undergoes soft examination focused on children's programming on one of their shows has left you and Media Matters engaged in bollocks? Sometimes business news programs like to have fun. Was there some crazy boycott the Muppets gathering that I missed? Because I would have liked to be there. Sesame Street is much better.

I think this whole process of waiting for people to slip up so that you can crucify them is anathema to freedom of the press and the free market. All these "Independent" Media watcher groups aren't helpful because they are not interested in just correcting inaccuracies and leaving it at that, they all have agendas and they all have big money controlling those agendas. Whatever happened to get the **** out of my way supply and demand concept of media consumption? If Eric Bolling is so offensive, degrading, and simple-minded, then I'm sure people would stop watching him on their own if we let them and maybe those people on Madison Avenue would pull advertising because their boss says so, and not because some overzealous wankers using hysteric boycotts as weaponry to chill free speech say so.
 
Back
Top