What's new
By:

ESPN has Exum #1

Everyone sees how good he is except Burks, Snyder and DL.

He can play and there's no reason he shouldn't be the starting two guard right now.
 
scootsy said:
Parker is not setting the league on fire (nor is any other rookie), but he is impacting every game on both ends and looks like the franchise player the Bucks hoped for when they drafted him.
Click to expand...

How does that sentence make sense at all? How can you look like a franchise player and not be setting the league on fire, or even close to it. He is also putting up absolutely atrocious +/- numbers.

I'm not saving Parker is a bust or even that he won't be a franchise player one day. I just thought your sentence was ridiculous
 
LjJazzman said:
How does that sentence make sense at all? How can you look like a franchise player and not be setting the league on fire, or even close to it. He is also putting up absolutely atrocious +/- numbers.

I'm not saving Parker is a bust or even that he won't be a franchise player one day. I just thought your sentence was ridiculous
Click to expand...

Not my sentence. Quote from the article.
 
franklin said:
Everyone sees how good he is except Burks, Snyder and DL.

He can play and there's no reason he shouldn't be the starting point guard right now.
Click to expand...

^fixed

Code: 
	    GP  MPG  FGM-FGA FG% 3PM-3PA 3P% FTM-FTA FT% RPG APG   BLKPG STLPG PFPG TOPG PPG
Burke Career 79  32.2  4.7-12.6 .373   1.5-4.8 .317   1.4-1.6  .891  2.9  5.6  0.1  0.7  2.1 1.91 2.4
Burks Career 210 21.8  3.5-8.0  .441   0.5-1.4 .349   2.4-3.2  .745  2.7  1.8  0.2  0.7  1.9 1.41 0.0
 
Last edited:
heyhey said:
^fixed

Code: 
	    GP  MPG  FGM-FGA FG% 3PM-3PA 3P% FTM-FTA FT% RPG APG   BLKPG STLPG PFPG TOPG PPG
Burke Career 79  32.2  4.7-12.6 .373   1.5-4.8 .317   1.4-1.6  .891  2.9  5.6  0.1  0.7  2.1 1.91 2.4
Burks Career 210 21.8  3.5-8.0  .441   0.5-1.4 .349   2.4-3.2  .745  2.7  1.8  0.2  0.7  1.9 1.41 0.0
Click to expand...

Thank you for putting ^fixed. I was about to get real offended when I noticed you changed my quote.
 
akirac73 said:
I still don't think Exum gets enough playing time...once he does (hopefully soon) I think he will start showing more of what he can do. I actually think he's holding back and playing conservative right now, and he's still impressive.
Click to expand...
QS!
I trust him and like what he is doing development-wise.
He is bringing Exum one step further each time. One day we will see that he has taken over!
 
wow so many ppl on this board have the jerry sloan mentatility. oh no need to rush dante's development, oh I like the slow pace that he's been brought up at, oh we can't throw him into the "wolves".

Screw that, we should be playing him a lot more. Even if that wasn't the right strategy (it is the right strategy), I would still want that to be the case for entertainment purposes. If Exum wasn't on the team I would not watch the Jazz. They are not that exciting, and Hayward, while a very good player, is not someone I'll go out of the way to turn the tv on.
 
VINYLONE said:
otIr7VJ.gif
Click to expand...

LOL .. I'd be interested to know what you're trying to say with that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top