What's new

Evolution - A serious question.

Why people argue with Dutch or CJ is beyond me. I might as well argue with my dog or the wall.

I agree. I wll occasionally rebut them to make clear their points are easily rebutted, but arguing with them is pointless.
 
Historian Wells tells of evolutionary teaching as follows: “Prevalent people .*.*. believed that they prevailed by virtue of the Struggle for Existence, in which the strong and cunning get the better of the weak and confiding. .*.*.

People believed this long before Darwin was born.

Evolution provided “Christendom” with self-justification for waging brutal war.

I have never read of the leader of a country using evolution to justify war. "Populations change over time, therefore we must kill the Frabians"? Seriously?

The book Evolution and Christians attributes ...

So? Why si this book more reliable that standards histories?

To this day, Communistic nations pursue their goal of world domination on the basis of the evolutionary teaching of “survival of the fittest.”

People trying to defend evolutionary theory were sent to the gulag under Stalin.

Phillip Johnson, a professor of criminal law at the University of California at Berkeley in the United States, ...

is not a biologist, and opposing evolutionary theory specifically to support a Biblically-literal interpretation of reality, and not for any other primary reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
evolution-vs-intelligent-design-190928.jpg
 
Back
Top