Evolution - A serious question.

[PearlWatson]

Now you're just lying and not debating. You're just making stuff up to make people angry and using that as justification.

You've been told countless times that what you're trying to pass of as evolution and its mechanisms as a whole is completely incorrect, yet you still try to argue against your disillusioned cloud of evolution as if that's what evolution is.

And to clear something up. All mammals have had the female and male sex organs. That developed long before mammals ever existed.

None of your accusations are true. You agreed that the NeoEvolutionary theory was about the mechanism of random mutation and natural selection supposedly being the engine of "change over time" from simple to complex organisms. You did add that it was more complicated (with no further explanation.) You also agreed that mutation is essential to new attributes on more complex organisms. Why would my posts make you angry? I don't get that.

On what animal did the sex organs first appear or start to appear from these random mutations? Tell me about how the first mammaries came about and how many mutations it took to get them things to have milk squirt out of them for the babies.

 

[PearlWatson]

Wow. You really living in your own little fantasy world.

Richard Dawkins is a moron. I can tell you that every professor I've had here at UChicago has has spoken of him very dismissively. You can't just quote Dawkins as a straw man and then push him over. *I* could do that. Dawkins doesn't speak for all atheists any more than you speak for all Christians.

This is pointless. I'm going to try my best to ignore this thread from here on out.

You are going to try to ignore this thread? You aren't even going to look at my response? Why the temper tantrum?

The Joker agrees that Dawkins is a relevant person...maybe because he is one of those disillusioned christian atheists:

We've mentioned several relevant persons and their ideas... Darwin, Dawkins, the expert I quoted Futuyama, among others...

 

[One Brow]

One of my favorite brilliant ID scientist dudes is named William Dembski

Dembski is not a scientist. He is a mathematician. Dembski is also a young-earth creationist, with a religious motivation.

who has this mathematical formula for detecting design in the universe,

No such formula exists. He has an idea that can't be put into a formula successfully.

which is distinct from chance or accident.

His explanatory filter treats design as the default when you can't prove chance or regularity (chance and accident would be the same thing in Dembski's EF). This means the EF has problems with false positives as well as false negatives. It's not useful.

He has himself a blog called Uncommon Descent

UD used to be a big joke because they banned anyone who disagreed at all, and because when they put up a post that was shown wrong, they would edit or remove it without notification. They may have improved since then.

where you can watch a video with a bunch of other ID scientist dudes if you care to learn anything other than what you've been fed in gubment schools.

As long as you don't mind being fed unreliable, useless information.

 

[One Brow]

You aren't even going to look at my response?

So? You haven't reponded to me in a few pages now. Why should anyone feel the need to respond to you?

 

[One Brow]

On what animal did the sex organs first appear or start to appear from these random mutations? Tell me about how the first mammaries came about and how many mutations it took to get them things to have milk squirt out of them for the babies.

You have it backwards. Milk preceded mammaries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactation#Evolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammary_gland#Evolution

 

[Scat]

Mammaries are one of God's greatest creatio..., um, I mean evolutionary advanc..., um, whatever they are, they are awesome!!

 

[PearlWatson]

I love mine.

 

[Scat]

I love mine.

How do you get anything done? I'd be playing with them all day if I had them.

 

[PearlWatson]

How do you get anything done? I'd be playing with them all day if I had them.

I can multitask.

 

[One Brow]

So? You haven't reponded to me in a few pages now. Why should anyone feel the need to respond to you?

Thread: Evolution - A serious... 07-06-2011 03:59 PM
take the hint dude Millsapa

The hint being that you don't really have good responses, so your just baiting other people? Works for me.

 

[The-Joker]

Hasn't you ever watched the show Pysch? I was using this meme the main character uses, "I've heard it both ways."

Oh I was supposed to understand your pop culture references from a substandard TV series...

My god, you are a moron.

 

[LogGrad98]

I like Psych. It is kind of fun. I am still uncertain how Futurama is a scientist, but ok.