Faster than I predicted

[moevillini]

I agree governments suck balls.
not the cool kinda sucking.
the bad kinda sucking

This post deserves some kind of an award.

 

[PearlWatson]

People are allowed by law to marry members of their own gender.
Yes, we are aware of your fears, which are completely unfounded and untrue.

Not in Idaho until earlier this month when the stay was lifted.

There are quite a few cases of fines and lawsuits against Christians because of not wishing to go against their conscience on this issue.
These pastors only avoided it because they changed their business to fit within this law, but they never should have had to in the first place.

 

[PearlWatson]

I'm quite sure that a bakery is not legally required to use any particular accessories or decorations. If a bakery only offers man-woman cake toppers they wouldn't be breaking the law. It would only be against the law to refuse to provide their existing services to someone based on that persons inclusion in a protected class.

Similarly, if there was a gay oriented cake shop and they refused to service "breeders" they would be breaking the same anti-discrimination law. As sexual orientation is a protected class.

You are kinda retarded if you think these bakers had homosexual cake toppers.

 

[DutchJazzer]

IANAL, but these are my understandings:

If a pornography studio offered to film any couple off the street, they would be required to film gay couples.

If a bakery only sold wedding cakes off the shelf, as opposed to making them to order, they could stock their shelves as they pleased.

so if you go on a site not gonna name it here where the have clips for sale
these custom clips from certain porn stars(don't know if there is one with men).
yet they don't have gay (or in case of queer porn stars straight clips made to order) i could sue them?
since these are not off the shelf clips, but cusotm made.

BRB gonna sew some of em NOW!

 

[One Brow]

so if you go on a site not gonna name it here where the have clips for sale
these custom clips from certain porn stars(don't know if there is one with men).
yet they don't have gay (or in case of queer porn stars straight clips made to order) i could sue them?
since these are not off the shelf clips, but cusotm made.

BRB gonna sew some of em NOW!

Do you mean, where actors take requests from the audience and enact those requests? I would be surprised if actors would be required to engage in any kind of physical activity they found distasteful, and I would be surprised as a porn site that would refuse to allow an actor to engage in an activity the actor was agreeable to.

By comparison, a couple having a wedding is asking a baker to bake a cake. The process of baking the cake does not change much between the couple being gay and straight, AFAICT.

 

[LogGrad98]

so if you go on a site not gonna name it here where the have clips for sale
these custom clips from certain porn stars(don't know if there is one with men).
yet they don't have gay (or in case of queer porn stars straight clips made to order) i could sue them?
since these are not off the shelf clips, but cusotm made.

BRB gonna sew some of em NOW!

I get that english is not your first language, but why do you often spell the same word multiple ways in the same post? Just curious.

 

[LogGrad98]

Do you mean, where actors take requests from the audience and enact those requests? I would be surprised if actors would be required to engage in any kind of physical activity they found distasteful, and I would be surprised as a porn site that would refuse to allow an actor to engage in an activity the actor was agreeable to.

By comparison, a couple having a wedding is asking a baker to bake a cake. The process of baking the cake does not change much between the couple being gay and straight, AFAICT.

I wonder this: why would a gay couple seek out and then sue a company that has made it pretty clear they wouldn't like to cater to gay couples? It seems this is what is happening. Is it a purposeful attack, so to speak? Take this wedding chapel for instance. They have not been hiding anything about their preferences, so why would the gay couple specifically seek out this chapel, in not just to make a spectacle and example out of them? Could there be ulterior motives at play?

(taking the obvious religious connotations out of the argument, say if a similar law were passed about religious institutions for ****s and giggles) If I wanted to be married by a mormon bishop because of religious affiliation, but I didn't want to be married on a freaking basketball court, and if I knew that the beautiful protestant church in the middle of town would not allow a mormon wedding there, I would not make a huge stink about it, I would just seek out a venue that was ok with this being a mormon wedding.

 

[DutchJazzer]

I get that english is not your first language, but why do you often spell the same word multiple ways in the same post? Just curious.

so that i get some right

 

[LogGrad98]

so that i get some right

Google is your friend.

 

[Stoked]

Google is your friend.

Nope, they supported Obama. Google is the enemy.

 

[DutchJazzer]

]Google[/B] is your friend.

back on topic they dont sue pornogrphy for discriminating cus they are *******.
they wont win that fight.


funny thing is it is wrong to force pronostars to do gay ****.
but not wrong to force people to do gay **** against their princaple.


**** they gay right groups right up the ***

 

[fishonjazz]

so that i get some right

Lol