What's new
By:

Favors or Monroe: Whom would you rather have?

One thing to think about is that Monroe has what are effectively "old" skills. I like the guy a lot but there is a legitimate question about how much more he's going to improve given that many of the things that he does well (decision making, understanding offense, solid defensive work) are things that rookies generally improve on quickly. There's a lot of opportunity for other players to catch Monroe in the coming season.

The real question to my mind is Favors or Cousins. Both are young prodigious talents. Cousins is a headcase, Favors is raw.
 
Cousins is a badass. Not a headcase, but definitely a pouter and too often immature. But still a badass.
 
The question should be Monroe or Hayward and if we weren't already log jammed I'd take Monroe. I wanted him during the draft anyways :D
 
PKM said:
Cousins is a badass. Not a headcase, but definitely a pouter and too often immature. But still a badass.
Click to expand...

Take off the goggles for a second. People that attempt to assault teammates and coaches are headcases.

Okay, now resume shameless homering.
 
PKM said:
Cousins is a badass. Not a headcase, but definitely a pouter and too often immature. But still a badass.
Click to expand...

Not worried about his mental problems. I would be worried about his doughnut problem though. Still a fatass.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
Not worried about his mental problems. I would be worried about his doughnut problem though. Still a fatass.
Click to expand...

Saw him in the Dominican game and he had lost about all his baby fat. MUCH leaner and more mobile. Anyway, he's a great player and has proven that. The 'homer' stuff gets old ONLY because I'm more objective than most on here ... but I'm also much better looking, so it's all good.
 
PKM said:
Saw him in the Dominican game and he had lost about all his baby fat. MUCH leaner and more mobile. Anyway, he was a great COLLEGE player and has proven that. The 'homer' stuff gets old ONLY because I'm more objective than most on here ... but I'm also much better looking, so it's all good.
Click to expand...

Fixed.
 
PKM said:
Saw him in the Dominican game and he had lost about all his baby fat. MUCH leaner and more mobile. Anyway, he's a great player and has proven that. The 'homer' stuff gets old ONLY because I'm more objective than most on here ... but I'm also much better looking, so it's all good.
Click to expand...

If true, and he could even his body fat 10%, that would great for his game. He had pretty poor athletic numbers, but I think those were due to him being incredibly out of shape and fat.

I wish I had the patience to look at your first 100 or so post, when you were a 100% bonafide homer, but since then I think you have been one of the better posters.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
If true, and he could even his body fat 10%, that would great for his game. He had pretty poor athletic numbers, but I think those were due to him being incredibly out of shape and fat.

I wish I had the patience to look at your first 100 or so post, when you were a 100% bonafide homer, but since then I think you have been one of the better posters.
Click to expand...

I admitted to being a homer. Maybe I'm not sure what the real definition of homer is, but if it's backing your team, in good times and bad, then that's definitely me. If by definition it means you can't see things objectively because of your allegiance to a team, then I humbly say that doesn't describe me. It is possible, though, to say Kanter will be good (i.e.), have most disagree and to have still been objective. Objectivity is subjective. Now I'm ****** confused.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top