What's new
By:

Following 2016 potential draftees

#bern said:
He's not a leading player. He's also a young PG, PG's take time.

And honestly, who cares? The best player in the draft couldn't get his team to the tournament. It's a crappy draft. It's a team sport. Vandy isn't as talented as you think they are. I could go on and on, but I'll keep it short, your point is stupid and means practically nothing.
Click to expand...
He was Vandys leading player and is the third best in the draft according to you. I think that is worthy of being held to a standard.

Candy had 3 NBA players on their roster, LSU had two at best.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
King Cy said:
He was Vandys leading player and is the third best in the draft according to you. I think that is worthy of being held to a standard.

Candy had 3 NBA players on their roster, LSU had two at best.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Who? Damien Jones...an NBA prospect because of his size, not his skill, and Kornet, who's a fringe prospect and fits the pro game better than the college game?

Look, some guys can take a leading role and do well. Some guys can't, at least not yet. Yeah, Baldwin struggled to lead Vandy, but he won't have that role here. There's not many guys with his combination of offensive skills, length, and defensive ability. He's still only 20. Dude can ball. Forget the stupid narratives and just watch him play.

Y'all put way too much emphasis on how a team does to evaluate a player. It's a minor part, there's so much that goes into a team doing well. Luck, chemistry, coaching (coaches ruin college bball).
 
#bern said:
Who? Damien Jones...an NBA prospect because of his size, not his skill, and Kornet, who's a fringe prospect and fits the pro game better than the college game?

Look, some guys can take a leading role and do well. Some guys can't, at least not yet. Yeah, Baldwin struggled to lead Vandy, but he won't have that role here. There's not many guys with his combination of offensive skills, length, and defensive ability. He's still only 20. Dude can ball. Forget the stupid narratives and just watch him play.

Y'all put way too much emphasis on how a team does to evaluate a player. It's a minor part, there's so much that goes into a team doing well. Luck, chemistry, coaching (coaches ruin college bball).
Click to expand...
Lmao

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
stitches said:
What's the most you would give Boston for the #3 pick?
Click to expand...

Thats a good question and i wish free agency was before the draft like the nfl. Since it is not i want to say hayward but i think the jazz would be better with him. It is tough because if DL thinks he will leave next summer then pull the trigger.
 
Crocodile Dante said:
Thats a good question and i wish free agency was before the draft like the nfl. Since it is not i want to say hayward but i think the jazz would be better with him. It is tough because if DL thinks he will leave next summer then pull the trigger.
Click to expand...

To me the #3 is so much less valuable than 1 and 2 in this draft that I probably wouldn't give any real asset we have that could make the Celtics even consider. Definitely not Hayward.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top