What's new
By:

Following potential 2012 draftees

Hotttnickkk said:
You heard offensive, I hear defensive. Both points are valid to a certain extent regardless of what Freak actually said.

A Favors & Kanter frontline would be great length wise, but could be a bit slow chasing quicker players around.
Click to expand...

Yes, there is going to be a disadvantage in quickness, but you make up for it in size, strength, and length. Every lineup is going to have a weakness. Favors is a 4. It's his natural position. The Jazz management have said it, Favors has said it. He is raw offensively, but it's coming along.
 
Favors speed and quickness advantage at the 5 is bigger than his size/strength advantage as a 4. But he can play both.

However, if Kanter is for real, the opposing D will basically choose which player is which position offensively.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
So even though we've always viewed Kanter & Favors as our corner stone at C and PF, I'd trade Kanter for a proven player (say Rondo) or a stud rookie (Beal). May be give up a bit more to get Rondo and get something back as well for Beal.
Click to expand...

I'd throw in the GSW pick and hope they didn't also demand the Jazz' 2013 first if it were for Rondo or Harden. You start adding talent like that and even Al Jefferson starts looking pretty damn good.

You can make the case that Kanter for Beal requires dragging that scrubby *** point guard Harris along with him.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
So because Favors has similar measurement numbers to Howard he is automatically a center?
Click to expand...

Is it a necessity for you to be exhausting in every ****ing post? I never said that. But to say he's a 4 is ****ing dumb when his measureables are in-line with Howard's and his stats suggest he's better at the 5. But continue to ignore the last part if you want.
 
Wes Mantooth said:
Is it a necessity for you to be exhausting in every ****ing post? I never said that. But to say he's a 4 is ****ing dumb when his measureables are in-line with Howard's and his stats suggest he's better at the 5. But continue to ignore the last part if you want.
Click to expand...

Are his stats better at center because he played next to Millsap, instead of Kanter or Jefferson? Or are they better because he is at center? I think it is the former.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top