What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

One thing I think the Jazz will have to think about is potentially trading one of our 1st round picks next year to the Bulls for the rights of Mirotic. I believe we would have to pay him extra because it has been 3 years since he was drafted, but he would have been top 3 I think if he were in this year's draft.
 
One thing I think the Jazz will have to think about is potentially trading one of our 1st round picks next year to the Bulls for the rights of Mirotic. I believe we would have to pay him extra because it has been 3 years since he was drafted, but he would have been top 3 I think if he were in this year's draft.

Would be hard to get him. They fancy Mirotic to replace Boozer, who is already their weakest link, in a couple years. He will also be 100% NBA ready when he comes over so fits in perfect with their contending window.
 
Reminds me of the 2005 NBA draft... Bogut was the clear No. 1 (and the conventional wisdom would say - if in doubt - go BIG).

Doesn't mean Dwill/CP3 doesn't have just as much potential though...

Well let's say Blake Griffin vs Harden? Before the draft it's 100% Blake.

With how his game has translated to the NBA, and with hindsight, I'm taking Harden.

These are textbook examples of fallacy by analogy.
 
True.. but what I'm saying is even if Randle had a stunner of a season at UK and Andrew had an above average season, it's still hard to say who is BPA in say 5 years' time.

Randle could just be abusing "Kids" in college, while Andrew's skills set could be solid enough to thrive in the NBA (in the Westbrook/Harden trajectory of starting off slowly then shoots off).

All I'm saying is BPA isn't based on college stats alone, it's who that player will be at his peak.

Don't mean to be rude but.....duh.
 
These are textbook examples of fallacy by analogy.

Well I'm not saying take it as Gospel... but it's something to think about.

Don't mean to be rude but.....duh.

Don't mean to be rude but......

letthehateflow.jpg
 
Back
Top