hilarious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcUjhBj4nMw
96 total minutes = 32 for each. That's enough for all 3.So just for speculation if Jazz get #3 and Randle is last of big three available Jazz must take him.
If he is as good as projected Jazz should trade one of Favors or Kanter.
Just don't see how Jazz could effectively play Randle, Favors, and Kanter in a three man PF-C rotation.
Randle if good as projected would be Jazz #1 player at PF and need max minutes.
96 total minutes = 32 for each. That's enough for all 3.
Agree. Money may become an issue in a few years, but minutes will be there.
When is $ not an issue?
Right now.
Agree. Money may become an issue in a few years, but minutes will be there.
Jazz. I am talking about salaries and cap space. You dig?
Money becomes an issue in five years. Assuming Jazz give contracts in the $10-12M range for Hayward, Favors and Kanter and $6-7M for Burks (if he has a couple of very good years), the team can stay under the luxury tax threshold. It will become difficult once Utah has to pay out for Burke, perhaps Gobert, the 2014 pick(s) and then the next contracts for Gordon, Derrick and Enes. Eventually one of them will probably have to be traded. I salute the vision of Lindsey for getting a 2017 unprotected pick. That might be the draft Utah looks for a rookie replacement at PF or one of the wings.