What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

Randle has to be a PF, IMO. It's his relentless, attacking, low post game that gets him buckets and to the FT line often, with his back to the basket and his rebounding that makes him special.
 
Hack wrote:

"This draft is basically this...

Jackpot
1. Wiggins
2. Parker

Consolation prizes
3. Marcus Smart
4. Julius Randle
5. Joel Embiid
6. Dante Exum "

First off Joel Embiid will be the #1 pick and it will be a no brainer runnaway. He is Hakeem!

Tier 2- Perrenial All Stars
Parker/Wiggins
Tier 3- Multi Year All Stars
Randle
Tier 4- Potential All Stars
Smart
Exum
possible up to 6-7 other All Stars in this draft:
Lavine, Cauley Stein as a defensive star, Vonleigh, Harrison twins, Young, Hood, Saric and other potential suitors who might emerge late like Lavine has of late.

What happened to quoting?


You could be right? Im still deciding on Embiid.
 
He usually scores with his face-up game.

Actually that's not true. He's constantly catching the ball in the post with his back to the basket. Sure he'll take it and face up, he'll spine to the hoop, etc, but much of his offense is initiated with his back to the basket. You want him in the post - that is where he is most effective.
 
Actually that's not true. He's constantly catching the ball in the post with his back to the basket. Sure he'll take it and face up, he'll spine to the hoop, etc, but much of his offense is initiated with his back to the basket. You want him in the post - that is where he is most effective.

I've already done an extensive analysis of how his team benefits from him holding the ball top of the key, dribble/drive and score and creating for others, etc.


It's buried in this thread somewhere, but I'm too lazy to look for it.
 
I've already done an extensive analysis of how his team benefits from him holding the ball top of the key, dribble/drive and score and creating for others, etc.


It's buried in this thread somewhere, but I'm too lazy to look for it.

We could argue this point until we turn blue, but it's his play with his back to the basket that makes him special. Yes, he is very effective facing up and putting the ball on the floor, but that's just because he's a great player. It's the back to the basket game that really sets him apart.

This video against Michigan State is a great example of what I'm talking about. Today's game wasn't much different - the Belmont coach simply had no answer to Randle in the post.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdsY62qaCoA
 
I hate to say it.. but kkk is more right on this.

He scores most of his points in the paint, but a FAR higher % of those shots is taking his man off the dribble from 18'+ out.
 
I hate to say it.. but kkk is more right on this.

He scores most of his points in the paint, but a FAR higher % of those shots is taking his man off the dribble from 18'+ out.

You don't have to hate to say it, sometimes it isn't a lot of fun being wrong, but hate is a strong word. Watch the Michigan State video. But again, I'll tell you the same thing - since none of us have the stats to back it up, in terms of frequency of his points - I'll just say that it's his low post game that sets him apart. That is what makes him a great and unique talent. There just aren't guys in college and even in the NBA to an extent that really hurt you consistently with their back to the basket. That's the larger point I'm making - you want Randle at the 4 where he can utilize his low post game to hurt teams.
 
Back
Top