What's new
By:

Following potential 2014 draftees

spycam1 said:
If we get the 7th pick, I could also see us packaging Kanter with our pick (and maybe the GS pick, if need be) to move up to 5 and get Randle.

Randle is a more natural PF and would probably be a better fit next to Favors.
Click to expand...

I just threw up in my mouth. Randle isn't worth moving up for, especially if it means trading Kanter to do it.

I'm all for drafting a PF/C, then using Kanter to grab a SF (Thaddeus Young pls).
 
spycam1 said:
I'd def be willing to package our picks to move up for Randle.
Click to expand...

I guess I wouldn't really care as long as we either used the latter pick or Kanter to get a legit SF.

If anything, this past trade-deadline has shown me the Jazz need to get their *** in gear and start competing. With so many teams tanking, I think there will be players who can be had for 50 cents on the dollar in FA and in trades. Go against the grain and you will get more opportunities.
 
Gordon finished 23 and 8.

Also hit his two 3-point attempts. The fact that he has shown some ability to hit 3's gives me hope that he has legitimate offensive potential. Just has to keep developing his confidence in his offense.
 
Trading Kanter or Favors + #6 might get us to #4 with a lower pick coming back to us, assuming the team we're trading with isn't high on Exum or Randle. I don't think anyone will trade a top 3 pick.

That might work for us if the Jazz decide Kanter and Favors aren't great together and they don't want to carry both salary extensions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top