What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

You're right…Randle really shut down Louisville. His guy only shot 77%! Pretty damn good.

But I'd love for you to tell me more about how this guy, who despite being athletic and a good post player, averages only 0.8 blocks and 0.5 steals per game. I realize that blocks and steals should never be the only measure of a players defense, but come on…that's straight up pathetic.

His guy?

Because there's no such thing as switching, zone defense, or team defense in college basketball?

What about Gordon's "guy?" What percentage did he make last game? Since, obviously you've been tracking man to man defense his tournament apparently.
 
Oh no. Not at all. I wouldn't be disappointed in a Gordon pick. He has a ton of potential. But the last few days the Gordon homers, like CY/Hantlers, have made it sound like he's lebron. Every time Randle's name is mentioned they bring up Randle's lack of a jumper while ignoring Gordon's zero offensive game and just awful FT shooting.

I'm a Gordon homer? I ignore Gordon's lack of offensive game. I just mentioned his crappy offensive game 15 minutes ago you moron. Good grief.
 
His guy?

Because there's no such thing as switching, zone defense, or team defense in college basketball?

What about Gordon's "guy?" What percentage did he make last game? Since, obviously you've been tracking man to man defense his tournament apparently.

You're right, he didn't defend him the entire time. You got me!

Randle sure is a great defender. It's just too bad you don't have any proof of it.
 
Oh, and the reason I didn't include Michigan is because they play more of a 4 wing, 1 post game…which means that Randle didn't get to defend a post player for the majority of the game, whereas against Louisville he did. I'm sure you could have figured that out on your own though.
 
I'm a Gordon homer? I ignore Gordon's lack of offensive game. I just mentioned his crappy offensive game 15 minutes ago you moron. Good grief.

The funny thing is that you think I'm just talking to and about you.

What part of Gordon homers (plural) don't you understand?
 
Can anyone point to a guy that became a better defender in the pros than he was in college? I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but I cannot think of it. I do know players that developed quite a bit on offense, however. I guess that is my biggest bias when it comes to Gordon v. Randle. I have always coveted a lock down guy that we can throw against somebody running roughshod on us offensively. I have seen enough of Gordon play live to know that he is coachable and has a high bb IQ. Worst case I think you get a top 5 wing defender with the ability to score moving to the basket, best case is probably a level-headed, prime Kirilenko who plays better man-on-man defense. That's quite a player. I just think the mean for Randle is Kanter who we already have. Best case is possibly Zach Randolph? I'm not sure Kanter can't be that player either. I think the odds are that Randle will be better than Kanter, but will he be superior enough to give up Gordon for?
Again, I'm just happy that we get to talk about CHOOSING Randle or Gordon rather than hope someone becomes damaged goods and falls to us like which is generally where we are.
 
The funny thing is that you think I'm just talking to and about you.

What part of Gordon homers (plural) don't you understand?

You specifically mentioned me, so that's what I'm talking about. That's typically what happens when you mention a person.

Could you detail what makes you think I'm a Gordon homer? Or are you just going to ignore that like everything else when you get proven wrong?
 
You're right, he didn't defend him the entire time. You got me!

Randle sure is a great defender. It's just too bad you don't have any proof of it.

LOL!

Case in point.

Who said Randle was a great defender? Please find this quote for me.

See how some of these folks react? It's all or nothing.

Let me spell it out for you: Randle isn't Dwight Howard. But he isn't close to being boozer.

I see no reason why Randle isn't, won't be, and won't continue to be a good defender. Is he elite? Nope. But it's pretty clear when folks criticize his defense it's only to grasp at straws. Typically, it's used by those (in general) trying to diminish his accomplishments while exaggerating Gordon's.
 
Can anyone point to a guy that became a better defender in the pros than he was in college? I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but I cannot think of it. I do know players that developed quite a bit on offense, however. I guess that is my biggest bias when it comes to Gordon v. Randle. I have always coveted a lock down guy that we can throw against somebody running roughshod on us offensively. I have seen enough of Gordon play live to know that he is coachable and has a high bb IQ. Worst case I think you get a top 5 wing defender with the ability to score moving to the basket, best case is probably a level-headed, prime Kirilenko who plays better man-on-man defense. That's quite a player. I just think the mean for Randle is Kanter who we already have. Best case is possibly Zach Randolph? I'm not sure Kanter can't be that player either. I think the odds are that Randle will be better than Kanter, but will he be superior enough to give up Gordon for?
Again, I'm just happy that we get to talk about CHOOSING Randle or Gordon rather than hope someone becomes damaged goods and falls to us like which is generally where we are.

Paul George comes to mind.
 
You specifically mentioned me, so that's what I'm talking about. That's typically what happens when you mention a person.

Could you detail what makes you think I'm a Gordon homer? Or are you just going to ignore that like everything else when you get proven wrong?

What the hell have you proven again?

And what part of Gordon homers do you not understand? Other than every single part?
 
Paul George comes to mind.

Folks like hantlers/CY (there, I mentioned you specifically. Happy now?) loved g time over Paul George. They pimped him like no tomorrow. Yet, we are to trust them on this this Gordon vs Randle debate? Hilarious!
 
Back
Top