What's new

Following potential 2015 draftees

No.

I'm following your Mario logic but Towns will be the best player from this draft.

I'd throw Favors and multiple first rounders (like 4 or 5 of them) for Towns. Too bad Minny says no each time.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Yikes, and no thanks. Most of what u write I usually like, but his not so much. Favors is turning into a pretty good 2 way player, and I don't think Towns is one of those cant miss complete stud that comes around once every 10 or so years. I think he'll be good but not good enough to lose Favors and some 1's. I don't think that can't miss player is in the draft this year.
 
Yikes, and no thanks. Most of what u write I usually like, but his not so much. Favors is turning into a pretty good 2 way player, and I don't think Towns is one of those cant miss complete stud that comes around once every 10 or so years. I think he'll be good but not good enough to lose Favors and some 1's. I don't think that can't miss player is in the draft this year.

Oh and Min says hell ya on that trade. Lol. Faves and 4 no. 1's if it were me I'd say yes so fast then laugh at the entire Jazz org for being sooooo dumb. Lol
 
Yikes, and no thanks. Most of what u write I usually like, but his not so much. Favors is turning into a pretty good 2 way player, and I don't think Towns is one of those cant miss complete stud that comes around once every 10 or so years. I think he'll be good but not good enough to lose Favors and some 1's. I don't think that can't miss player is in the draft this year.
Obviously we disagree. My thinking is that Towns has the potential to be a top 5 player in the league. Pair that with Rudy who could be top 10 and suddenly you have a special team. This of course is my opinion. Take it or leave it.

Also, can you tone down the Dekker love? I see a lot of Trey Burke type characteristics and he'd be good to have but not until the 20's or so.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 
Obviously we disagree. My thinking is that Towns has the potential to be a top 5 player in the league. Pair that with Rudy who could be top 10 and suddenly you have a special team. This of course is my opinion. Take it or leave it.

Also, can you tone down the Dekker love? I see a lot of Trey Burke type characteristics and he'd be good to have but not until the 20's or so.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

We will have to agree to disagree on the values of Towns and Dekker. As far as Dekker being Trey... Dekker has the measurable's and a ton of physical attributes u want as a sf who can play the stretch 4 with no problem. Not a Trey Burke. Not even close


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
We will have to agree to disagree on the values of Towns and Dekker. As far as Dekker being Trey... Dekker has the measurable's and a ton of physical attributes u want as a sf who can play the stretch 4 with no problem. Not a Trey Burke. Not even close


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm talking about Dekkers rise up draft boards because of some tourney games where he hit shots at a much higher rate than during the regular season as well as his career.

Like I said, Dekker is nice but just not where the Jazz are selecting. I wouldn't consider him before 20 at all.

I still value your input even if I disagree.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 
I'm talking about Dekkers rise up draft boards because of some tourney games where he hit shots at a much higher rate than during the regular season as well as his career.

Like I said, Dekker is nice but just not where the Jazz are selecting. I wouldn't consider him before 20 at all.

I still value your input even if I disagree.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I agree with you. Bathe two I hope Jazz stay from is dekker and Kandinsky. The only two in jazz range that I really hate the most.
 
I'm talking about Dekkers rise up draft boards because of some tourney games where he hit shots at a much higher rate than during the regular season as well as his career.

Like I said, Dekker is nice but just not where the Jazz are selecting. I wouldn't consider him before 20 at all.

I still value your input even if I disagree.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

His FT% of 70.6% seems to indicate he will always be an average to slightly below average 3 pt shooter in the pro's. If you draft Dekker, I believe you do it because you believe Wisconsin's gameplan limited his ability to show open court skills. He is a good athlete with size and length. To me is more Marvin Williams than anyone else.
 
His FT% of 70.6% seems to indicate he will always be an average to slightly below average 3 pt shooter in the pro's.

I'm driving so I can't look but what did Trey Burke shoot from the free throw line in college?

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 
His FT% of 70.6% seems to indicate he will always be an average to slightly below average 3 pt shooter in the pro's. If you draft Dekker, I believe you do it because you believe Wisconsin's gameplan limited his ability to show open court skills. He is a good athlete with size and length. To me is more Marvin Williams than anyone else.
Again, I like Dekker, just not before 20. If Trey was drafted in the 20's we'd feel differently about him.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top