karl malone
Well-Known Member
I don't know enough to really comment on prospects, but most of us don't and I'm going to comment anyway:
If you think Hezonja can be a legit offensive hub/alpha that won't disrupt the chemistry of the team too much, then you grab him. If you think he's anything less and still has the potential to cause problems on or off the court and doesn't play great D, then I take Stanley Johnson or Winslow over him all day. You can never have too much defense, but you can quickly have diminishing returns on ball-dominant offensive players.
Good points. I agree with what you said & obviously don't know enough about the character of Hezonja to say for certain one way or the other, but one of the reasons I am so high on him (aside from his offensive potential) is his length & athleticism. He may not project to be the type of lockdown defender that both Winslow & Johnson project to be, but he appears to have the tools to become a plus defender (on top of being an elite scorer), so long as he has the drive & determination to apply those tools to both sides of the ball. How he carries himself in pre-draft interviews will likely be the determining factor. If we didn't have the elite interior defense that we do or the lack of a go-to-scorer, I would prefer Winslow, but with the stable foundation that we have developed over this past year, I think Hezonja would be much less of a risk for us, than he would be for a team such as PHI, MIN, or SAC for example.