What's new
By:

Following potential 2015 draftees

Can Matt Stainbrook from Xavier be a NBA center?

Dude was a pretty good passer and was extremely tough. His measurements are good enough to be a center.
 
stitches said:
Our FO is one of the FOs that leak the least information when it comes to plans for the draft. They seem to keep everything close to the vest and I don't see a case where they actually are giving him any sort of legitimate information about our plans to air out to the world. In fact, I think it's more likely(still not very likely) they are giving him smokescreens to propagate, than actual information. Our FO has absolutely no use of actual information about our plans leaking. It makes their job harder if anybody outside of the organization knows what we are planning. I simply don't see them leaking info they don't want leaked. Also, keep in mind that they probably don't even have any plans right now. They haven't even started seriously discussing who they prefer in the draft. Right now they seem to be in information accumulation mode, then when all information is in, they will start constructing the board and debating if they like Lyles better than Kaminsky or Portis, etc.

With that said, he probably has more access than most to workouts and info other people don't have, and some players might jump up to him(Rudy?). But yah, in general, I don't believe Locke is projecting any real plans out. I think he's careless with his statements sometimes and careless with the way he judges prospects he hasn't watched, but I guess that's part of his job - he has to talk about something at the end of the day...
Click to expand...

Agree with this. They have to give out some info, and if they're giving good info to the media, that would make them amateurish. It's not so much smoke screening to intentionally try to mislead, but avoiding tipping their hand.
 
BENTLEY said:
None of us know anything, but I'm just saying whatever Locke says I'm leery of. Plus, he bugs me.
Click to expand...

I'm officially bugged by him too... Again he rails on about Kaminsky being risky based on guys not succeeding in their first two years of college. Gives the same two examples (udoh and Wesley Johnson) and ignores hosts of other examples.

Also didn't even look at Frank's birthday to find out if he was an 18 year old freshman or a 19 year old freshman (he was 18 btw)

Since 2009 guys that were not great until senior or junior years or that didn't show NBA promise until 20 years old (or ever) that are now decent NBA players many of which who have out performed their draft position:

Draymond Green
Festus Ezeli
Kelly Olynyk
Jimmy Butler
Tyler Zeller
Mason Plumlee (was always an NBA prospect but statistically didn't show until he was "beating up on children")
Markieff Morris
Nikola Vucevic
John Henson (similar to Plumlee)
Demarre Carroll
Taj Gibson (he was a 20 year old freshmen so not sure how this compares)
Iman Shumpert
Larry Sanders
Chandler Parsons (never really dominant ever)

There are others that outperformed draft position. I agree with Layne Vashro that this actually might be the new draft inefficiency and I hope that other NBA folks still see it the way Locke does.

The narrative is so tired... just wish he'd actually look at the player.
 
If we get Trey Lyes I will be pissed. I would like anyone else at twelve. Even Kaminski which would be like going right back after a Kanteresk player a year after move him for nothing.
 
Would you guys consider trading down? Like trading 12th and a 2nder for Boston's 16th and 28th pick? The Jazz can still get great solid players at 16 like Kaminsky, Portis, Dekker, Hollis-Jefferson, Looney, Grant and Payne. As for 28th, I don't know. Maybe someone that impresses during the workouts.
 
If you look at years past, it's pretty rare that anyone can predict who the Jazz will end up with. The move for Burke was a surprise. Getting Exum was a surprise. Getting Hood at 22 was a surprise. Drafting Hayward was something only a few people predicted.

As for Locke, I think he's trying to keep people interested in the draft and doing his part to keep that conversation happening with his audience. However, he doesn't seem to be obsessing much about any of the players. He's done two of his draft analyses by looking at a few games. He doesn't seem all that into it, tbh. The one thing he's doing is countering the argument that Kaminsky is perfect for the Jazz. He may be doing that in earnest or as a smokescreen. Who knows.

If Locke does know how the FO is leaning, he won't say it publicly and he'll likely avoid the subject. The fact that nothing at all is being said about Dekker, Turner or Portis leads me to believe that they're actually under consideration.
 
If I had to guess, I would think the Jazz really like Hezonja, Porzingis and Johnson, and they hope one of them slips or that they can move up a few spots to snag one of them. Johnson is the most likely candidate to slip to 12.

I think they probably like Turner, Oubre and Booker well enough, but aren't over-the-top excited about them. They are only incrementally better than guys available later in the draft.

That's just me guessing.
 
stormkoopacv03 said:
Would you guys consider trading down? Like trading 12th and a 2nder for Boston's 16th and 28th pick? The Jazz can still get great solid players at 16 like Kaminsky, Portis, Dekker, Hollis-Jefferson, Looney, Grant and Payne. As for 28th, I don't know. Maybe someone that impresses during the workouts.
Click to expand...

Depends on who is available at 28... there is a pretty steep drop off at around 23-24ish imo.
 
stitches said:
If we draft Dekker with Turner, Kaminsky and Oubre still on the board I'd be shocked...
Click to expand...

Me and a bunch of fellow Jazzfanz would have a conniption if we took Dekker over Turner. Also, I would be shocked if one of our 2nd rounders isn't a Euro stash as our roster is almost set and there are a bunch of intriguing foreign players showing up in the mocks.
 
Catchall said:
If I had to guess, I would think the Jazz really like Hezonja, Porzingis and Johnson, and they hope one of them slips or that they can move up a few spots to snag one of them. Johnson is the most likely candidate to slip to 12.

I think they probably like Turner, Oubre and Booker well enough, but aren't over-the-top excited about them. They are only incrementally better than guys available later in the draft.

That's just me guessing.
Click to expand...

Completely agree.

I think the Jazz want somebody in that second tier (picks 5-10). Moving up 2-4 spots to get one of the Euros or Johnson is my desired outcome. I'm guessing we would have to give up Burks or Hood.

Best case scenario imo is Turner falling to us. No assets given up and we're in the situation where we can afford to take a risk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top