What's new

Following potential 2015 draftees

With regard to them paying the tax... its not just about money. Its about flexibility as well. there are limitations on taxpayers and limitations on repeaters. So, let me rephrase... they don't have to do it, but there are many reasons why they should. We aren't talking pennies here... it is literally like $50M dollars. You aren't getting $50M in value out of him and super rich people are not stupid.

So, they haven't paid Luxury Tax so far. So no repeat offender status and it's literally impossible with the exploding cap to slide into tax range the summers after that. So there's little in regard to that.
Tax threshold projection for 15/16 is $81.6M per DX.
GSW currently has $77.5M guaranteed per basketballinsiders. That includes 8 guaranteed contracts. Max contract for Green would start at $16M per if I'm not mistaken. That pushes that number to $93.5M.
If they don't retain Speights's $3.8M team option, they'd need to add at least 4 more vet min contracts, totaling $2M for rooks. That's a total of $95.5M.
$14M above the threshold.
That would be $26M in tax.
If you look at the value that a(nother) championship would bring to a franchise, I'm pretty sure it's more than that. They could also use money thad made in previous years to pay next year's tax. After that it's impossible anyways to hit the tax anyways for at least 2 more years.
I doubt they'll find a nice trade for Lee in the summer, but attaching assets before the draft deadline could happen if they feel Lee isn't important for their chemistry/on court success or injuries to key player(s) prevent them from contending in the first place.

Porter is more playable in a playoff series than Giannis. Teams would just ignore Giannis and let him shoot open jumpers.

Both are young. Giannis probably 2 years younger. He was good enough to lead Milwaukee into the playoffs, while Porter was coattail surfing in Otto Pilot mode. I think it's more important for young players to earn a pedigree in the regular season and learn as they learn the ropes of post season success.
 
Look at those top 6 picks in DX. This is a really nice draft.

If the Jazz really have their choice of Turner, Johnson and Oubre at 12, they can't complain. I'd probably go with Turner.
I'd take Stanley Johnson and laugh all the way to the bank. In the hands of a skilled player developmental coaching staff he will turn out to be a strait up stud. Physically he has an NBA ready body, and his skill set reminds me a lot of Jimmy Butler. My hope is that he can elevate his offensive game to be a true two-way player and start opposite Gordon Hayward. As highly as I think of Burks and Hood, that would be a fantastic outcome.
 
I'd pick Johnson if both him and Turner are available, but I love Turner's potential. The gap has been getting smaller between those two in my big board... I don't know if my mind would change by draft night.
 
I'd pick Johnson if both him and Turner are available, but I love Turner's potential. The gap has been getting smaller between those two in my big board... I don't know if my mind would change by draft night.

Someone please convince me that Stanley Johnson will be better than TJ Warren and Jared Dudley. I'm actually not 100% convinced he has as much motor as those guys.

I'll go watch me some SJ highlights and try to get psyched.
 
I'd take Stanley Johnson and laugh all the way to the bank. In the hands of a skilled player developmental coaching staff he will turn out to be a strait up stud. Physically he has an NBA ready body, and his skill set reminds me a lot of Jimmy Butler. My hope is that he can elevate his offensive game to be a true two-way player and start opposite Gordon Hayward. As highly as I think of Burks and Hood, that would be a fantastic outcome.

I really really wish he were an inch or two taller, and a tad quicker and more explosive.
 
He's a better defender than both from day 1. Much better!

But the coaching staff will have to work on his offensive game for certain. His finishing around the rim was underwhelming and very surprisingly so, when you consider how strong he is and how he plays through contact.
 
I'm not as hyped about Johnson as some of you here. From what I've read he's probably a role player/solid player at best. I don't like how he didn't finish at the rim that well, while having a physical NBA body. I think a big is a lot more needed on our team and turner has a lot of potential.

We are hoping Johnson would become a 3/4 defender right?
 
I'm not as hyped about Johnson as some of you here. From what I've read he's probably a role player/solid player at best. I don't like how he didn't finish at the rim that well, while having a physical NBA body. I think a big is a lot more needed on our team and turner has a lot of potential.

We are hoping Johnson would become a 3/4 defender right?

Yeah I do think Turner has better potential but it's not guaranteed that he'll reach that potential. Johnson seems like he has a higher floor RIGHT NOW though... and you know you're gonna get a solid physical wing defender going forward.


Personality wise I think Turner is a better fit for our team. #Humble
 
I like Johnson, but I also see some risk there. Offensively, he's a 6'7" guy who benefited from being stronger and a bit quicker than college players. It may not all translate to the pros. All the exciting offensive things Johnson did, I also saw Derrick Williams do at Arizona. Now granted, Johnson may have a better work ethic and motor, but I wonder where Johnson is going to get his points other than spotting up and filling the lane.

I was psyched about the idea of Johnson playing the 4. His skills and versatility could be a real advantage at that position, but he measured an inch or two shorter than I thought he would at the combine. Then I saw Looney footage where it looked like Johnson couldn't deal with Looney's length. I don't think you can put Johnson at the 4 unless you call it small ball, basically.

He's a power-3, probably a better version of Rick Fox pre-injuries, but I'm not 100% convinced he adds a new dimension and impact to what we have.

Does he have enough shot creation, shot making, passing, rebounding to be a starter for the Jazz? It's not a given.
 
Back
Top