What's new

Following potential 2015 draftees

I'm not super high on Lyles.. But most are selling him short.

All most here have seen of his actual play is nothing. Don't lie.
He played limited minutes and almost exclusively at SF. He would have thrived, much better, at PF.
His skillset at his age and at 6'10 is impressive.

Just giving the counter, in the event you hear his name called.
I mentioned the other day hat had Lyles played for another high profile school he might be rated higher. The fact that he played mostly sf should tell us something about how under the radar he is. I would not complain if the Jazz take him. He could be a potential steal for the Jazz. He can play on the perimeter. He may not have NBA range but he's young and that bodes well for him to develop a three point shot.

Nope... just re-read it... got a call from my dad who got an alert for a trade. Apparently its a mock draft... this **** ain't real. My bad
Might want to read the title next time
Someone thinks the Pistons will target Johnson if Mudiay and Hezonja are gone.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/238311/Pistons-Zeroing-In-On-Stanley-Johnson-At-No-8
Read this on roto world 30 min ago
Wasn't Lance already traded to the Clippers?
Yes
 
I like even Lyles better than Dekker. Dunno why I'm so down on him, but I am. I'd be really disappointed.

I'm warming up to Lyles actually. If it wasn't for Locke's hyping him last couple of weeks I would have probably looked at him a bit more closely. Just can't stand the thought of agreeing with Locke.


- Longer than Dekker at legit 6'9 w/o shoes (Dekker is 6'7.75")

- Standing reach at 9'0" (Dekker is 8'10")

- Same steals, blocks and assists numbers as Dekker having played nearly 10min. less per game.

- Better FT% than Dekker. 73.5% vs 70.8%.

- Doesn't shoot the 3pt shot yet but his FT % is an encouraging sign.

- Currently slotted at #13 on DX, so obviously GMs are seeing the potential.


I like his potential as a Trevor Booker type replacement. He could get spot minutes this year at the 3 and the 4 and walk into Booker's role once Booker's contract is up.
 
Here's Locke's breakdown of Stanley Johnson:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPuFA69_bJY

I don't know if anybody posted this, I'm sorry if somebody did.... Here's Chad Ford's Mock draft:

https://espn.go.com/nba/draft2015/insider/story/_/id/13130972/mock-pick-pick-20-2015-nba-draft
Utah Jazz

Needs: backup PF, C, SG

Round 1 (12) Kevon Looney, F, Fr. UCLA
Round 2 (42) Rakeem Christmas, F/C, Sr., Syracuse
Round 2 (54) Larry Nance Jr., F, Sr., Wyoming

Analysis: The Jazz are one of the few teams in the lottery without any glaring needs. Their starting five of the future is pretty set: Dante Exum at point guard, Alec Burks at shooting guard, Gordon Hayward at small forward, Derrick Favors at power forward and Rudy Gobert at center. That starting five has a chance to be awesome someday, and I don't think anyone in Utah is going to mess with it. Burks is the biggest question mark of the group, but given his recent contract extension, they're going to try to make it work. And even if it doesn't, the way Rodney Hood played toward the end of the season gives them hope that his replacement might already be on their roster.

That frees them to take the best player available, and I think that's Looney. If there is a third tier in this draft, it ends around No. 12 and Looney is the last guy in it. He has the talent of a top-five pick, but it's still unclear where his position will be in the pros, and he's seen as a longer-term project than most. Utah has the flexibility to be able to wait on him. Someday he could be backing up both Favors and Hayward. He's one of the most versatile players in the draft and a steal at No. 12. Christmas doesn't have a huge amount of upside, but he's was super productive his senior year, can play the 4 and the 5 and should provide some rebounding and shot blocking off the bench.
 
Last edited:
Really don't feel like listening to Locke right now. What is his overall view of Johnson

-Liked his size/age.
-Doesn't love his shot, thinks he shot it pretty well regardless.
-Worried about the weak finishing, but attributed it partially to lack of spacing in the college game.
-Said he was an alright passer, nothing special.
-Loved his rebounding.
-Loved his man defense as well, thought he could guard 1-3 at least, maybe the 4 in some situations.
-Said he has some lapses in help defense.

Overall seemed pretty positive on him. Liked his effort/skill level for a young player.
 
Back
Top