Speaking of old school, Okafor reminds me a bit of James Donaldson. Now that's old school.
Actually, Derrick Coleman was a comp I though of for Towns, a big and talented lefty with 3-pt range. The young version of Sam Perkins might also apply. I keep thinking of old-school players.
I feel like Okafor was born in the wrong era of basketball.
Towns is such a weird ****ing player. There is no comp for him. Maybe a Kanter/Gasol combo.
I'm not convinced Towns will ever be a solid defender in the NBA. Unfortunately, it's impossible to determine at the collegiate level because he's so humongous. Impo, he looks like he'll be able to defend post ups quite well, but will be slow defending the pnr and soft at the rim. Even if all that turns out to be the case, he still shows the potential of eventually being able to shoot from anywhere, make proper passes, and post up mother****ers.
Who reminds you of Okafor then? I thought Coleman is a dead ringer, big, long, not overly athletic but has post moves to burn.
Completely disagree.
Also, I think the most valuable players are the most valuable. Size is an attribute that is a factor in computing overall value, but it's not the only one.
Obligatory sexual innuendo
Friday UK plays Texas. Will be a great opportunity to see future pros vs. future pros.
Could be an awful game to watch, though, considering UK is #1 in the nation in defense holding opponents to 27.9% and Texas is #2 holding opponents to 29.8%
The game could wind up having a final score resembling hockey.
If I'm honest I'm probably most concerned with his athleticism. He doesn't seems to have Okafor's size and post game, meaning he'll have to rely on his athleticism and explosiveness to succeed in the next level? Does he have THAT?
When I think Stanley Johnson I think of Ron Artest just because of his physical size and strength. Didn't Artest weigh 260 at his playing weight as a SF? Johnson is around 240 as a Freshman. Basically my only reason for comparing him to Artest.
That Kaminsky character is a bit more skilled than Kelly Olynyk, but I don't think I he'll impact the game much more. Not high on him right now.
He's elite strength and post moves. Limited by pedestrian athleticism. That's it. We don't likely need worry, though.. he'll be gone by our pick.
I think he grew 4" from 9th to 10th grade, 3" from 10th to 11th, and another 2.5" by start of college.
That's a lot of growing.. but not sure how it may have impacted him. No opinion there.
Ok so Johnson is pretty much a sure thing... if nothing else he can always hang his hats on his defensive intensity right?
I would say his ceiling is a more aggressive Kawhi????? I mean let's be honest that's legit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttmDLlYk0Zw
I guess a Handball game would be more accurate
Towns is pretty skilled. That's the upside teams will be betting on. Developing versatility.
A young Ron Artest is the best comparison I've seen. Very strong body, explosive considering his weight. Streaky from outside. Plays defense with an edge. Also my best candidate for a player who might require lobotomy to become a winner(Candidate for the Dion Waiters award)
Not just about how much he'll impact the game, but how he helps create space and mismatches for others to win games.
Dunno why everybody is afraid to say str8 up: Al Jefferson with a huge prayer he might become interested in playing defense and passing and develop more in Duncan's direction. But I guess Jefferson burned too many bridges in Utah
So basically he was a guard until he was 16? Didn't Davis show a similar growth spurt? I guess not everybody is not a natural talent when it comes to motion and body coordination to preserve the mobility of a guard.
I actually used Al Jeff in my comps for Okafor.. so not skeered bru.
Why are u suggesting Johnson doesn't play hard.. or did I misunderstand?