What's new
By:

Following potential 2017 draftees...

Saint Cy of JFC said:
You are the one bringing semantics into anything. I said there is a correlation. You keep babbling about nothing.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ength_in_students_of_SEGi_University_Malaysia

You are welcome to read on it if this interest you so much.
Click to expand...

WHAT IS THE CORRELATION?! NUMBERS.. LETS HEAR THEM... Cite other peoples **** all you want. tell us in your words.

vitruv_leo1.jpg
 
cross-sectional, anthropometric survey was conducted among local students (154 males and 164 females, total = 315) of SEGi University, Malaysia to correlate wingspan length to body length. Measurements were recorded and statistical analysis were done using SPSS version 21.0. Males were taller and had longer wingspan than females. The wingspan – body length ratio was 1.016, indicating wing span to be longer than body length. Males (1.023) had a significantly higher ratio than females (1.001). A strong positive correlation between the two measurements was observed (r = 0.93). The correlation coefficient was not significantly different in males (r = 0.824) and females (r = 0.789). Keywords: standing height, arm span, anthropometric measurements, stature.

Correlative study of wingspan (armspan) length and body length in students of SEGi University, Malaysia (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/public...ength_in_students_of_SEGi_University_Malaysia [accessed May 11, 2017].

Since you seem pretty stupid, a "r" value closer to +1 shows a strong relationship between the two variables.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
cross-sectional, anthropometric survey was conducted among local students (154 males and 164 females, total = 315) of SEGi University, Malaysia to correlate wingspan length to body length. Measurements were recorded and statistical analysis were done using SPSS version 21.0. Males were taller and had longer wingspan than females. The wingspan – body length ratio was 1.016, indicating wing span to be longer than body length. Males (1.023) had a significantly higher ratio than females (1.001). A strong positive correlation between the two measurements was observed (r = 0.93). The correlation coefficient was not significantly different in males (r = 0.824) and females (r = 0.789). Keywords: standing height, arm span, anthropometric measurements, stature.

Correlative study of wingspan (armspan) length and body length in students of SEGi University, Malaysia (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/public...ength_in_students_of_SEGi_University_Malaysia [accessed May 11, 2017].

Since you seem pretty stupid, a "r" value closer to +1 shows a strong relationship between the two variables.
Click to expand...

Ok so now were finally getting somewhere. Strong Relationship doesnt mean direct correlation *******. Check-mate.


You done now?
 
Why don't you guys exchange email addresses and continue this elsewhere...

PG_AB, I think you're going overboard with this. I'm not sure what your point is.
 
PG_AB said:
YOU CAN't demonstrate the argument yourself. We can both agree on that right? you're unfit to answer my questions.
Click to expand...

Man you are dumb as hell. Why would I gather data and run a SAS procedure just to prove a clearly obvious point to you? If you were trying to troll me into running a pointless statistical analysis, then lmao nice try.

You are probably just that stupid though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top