What's new
By:

Following potential 2017 draftees...

Jazz4ever said:
It also means you could never play him more than 12-15 minutes a game, he is a pure center. It wouldn't be a problem in year 1, but could be after that.
Click to expand...
I sorta disagree about Jeanne being a pure center. First, he can shoot it just a little- enough that one could at least have some hope that he could be reliable out to 18 feet or so. Second, he moves really well laterally. In fact watching his pro games, that might be what stood out most to me.

Hard to say and i could be wrong, but i think there's a chance he could play the 4.

Sent from my LG-K540 using Tapatalk
 
seattlejazzfan said:
I sorta disagree about Jeanne being a pure center. First, he can shoot it just a little- enough that one could at least have some hope that he could be reliable out to 18 feet or so. Second, he moves really well laterally. In fact watching his pro games, that might be what stood out most to me.

Hard to say and i could be wrong, but i think there's a chance he could play the 4.

Sent from my LG-K540 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

DX has a video of him shooting spot-up threes at the combine. He was making quite a few and surprised me. That's at NBA range too. I think he could play at the 4 as well.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Catchall said:
Whoever the Jazz draft needs to be able to shoot. The Playoffs show that you can't afford to have someone on the floor who is a non-shooter. Those players will get exposed. John Wall shooting 8/23 and 1/8 on 3s pretty much took the Wizards out in the 4th quarter. It makes me worry about Exum. Hopefully, he can keep developing as a shooter.

If Hood has a bad shooting game it also puts the Jazz behind the 8-ball.
Click to expand...

Then Rodions Kurucs would be the pick.

which I wouldn't mind
 
I'm a big Jeanne fan. I would be totally on board with him at 24. He has a ton of potential. His combination of length and movement/fluidity is rare. He has a smooth looking jumper that shouldn't be hard to develop. He's going to need some development and he needs to get stronger but the upside is undeniable.
 
If we are in win now mode, we shouldnt try to go up in the draft, it doesnt make sense. We may use 2 of our picks in a trade package.
Of course it all depends on Hayward. If he is gone, we might have to push for a small rebuild again.
 
sepanol said:
If we are in win now mode, we shouldnt try to go up in the draft, it doesnt make sense. We may use 2 of our picks in a trade package.
Of course it all depends on Hayward. If he is gone, we might have to push for a small rebuild again.
Click to expand...

The problem is the draft is before free agency... so I guess we'll just have to make the picks and hope for the best.
 
ONE LOVE said:
The problem is the draft is before free agency... so I guess we'll just have to make the picks and hope for the best.
Click to expand...

They should take free agency deadline to an earlier time. This way doesnt make much sense.
 
sepanol said:
They should take free agency deadline to an earlier time. This way doesnt make much sense.
Click to expand...

It depends from what perspective you're looking at.



Well I guess from the players perspective they get a complete picture of what the team's gonna be like, so they can make an informed decision.



From the team's perspective it kinda suck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top