Hood could easily get the max next year if he plays up to his potential and stays healthy.
Following potential 2017 draftees...
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
Hood could easily get the max next year if he plays up to his potential and stays healthy.
If we trade Diaw's contract it means we're taking back bad salary. The way we're structured, if we dump Diaw and Burks then that gives us just under the LT assuming we resign Hill, Hayward and Ingles. The question is really would you think it valuable enough to move up a few spots to sacrifice one of those guys? I think, with few exception, any move taking back salary in order to land another 'asset,' rather than an actual piece, would be an awkward, off-balanced side-shuffle right as we were picking up momentum on the original trajectory.
I think the target would be Kennard or Jackson if you get up to 15.
Park Bites
Well-Known Member
I just have a hard time seeing the jazz move up in to the teens in this draft.
Who ever you draft at 14 or 15 might not be as good as who you get at 30.
Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app
Who ever you draft at 14 or 15 might not be as good as who you get at 30.
Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app
The Jazz aren't going to take a terrible contract from a team in return for moving up in the draft. We are already basically over the cap and we have a lot of roster decisions to make this off season and next off season. We don't need a bad contract costing us the ability to re-sign our own players.
mellow
Well-Known Member
Jackson fits the jazz
mellow
Well-Known Member
I agree, sort of. I think Cy pointed this out already... in the back half of this draft there are more bigs with potential than pgs or wings. If the Jazz believe they must have another young wing in the works they will have to move up to get him. If they are looking for two quality back up bigs they can stand pat at 24 & 30.
I like Justin Jackson, I don't know how the jazz reach him without gutting the team.
The Jazz might be able to package 24 and 30 move up to 18 or maybe 17 in this draft. That doesn't involve taking back salary.
Is it worth it though? I mean... if they target a specific player they think is a can't miss prospect I guess they can do it... but I kind of think past 12-13 the next 10-15 players are not ones I would trade up for.
I think Jackson or Kennard could be worth it if they are available there.
A few guys are worth it. Plus, they may not want to take on more than a couple rookies.