What's new

Following potential 2017 draftees...

I really like Luke Kennard. He's my favorite sleeper who isn't a consensus first rounder.

He's currently at #34 on DX. I wouldn't mind taking him with our first round pick or the GSW first rounder.

19.8 PPG and 45.8% from 3 on 5.2 attempts a game.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

I love him too but would not take him with our own 1st. That's a reach imo. I also worry from the limited time I've seen him about his athleticism and ability to get his shot off in the NBA. That may be way off though. Love him.
 
Don't look now, but while Fox, Ball and DSjr have all improved their play in conference play, Fultz has dropped off. Fultz has the lowest PER and TS% of the four in conference.
 
Don't look now, but while Fox, Ball and DSjr have all improved their play in conference play, Fultz has dropped off. Fultz has the lowest PER and TS% of the four in conference.

Fultz's eye test is still remarkable. I think this has more to do with game planning and lack of help. His 3 point pull ups on the move vs UCLA were silky smooth
 
I haven't seen one second of Fultz but I'll guess he'll be the classic stat stuffer, losing team guy.
 
I love him too but would not take him with our own 1st. That's a reach imo. I also worry from the limited time I've seen him about his athleticism and ability to get his shot off in the NBA. That may be way off though. Love him.

GSW pick? Pretty much guaranteed to be #30.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
 
I love him too but would not take him with our own 1st. That's a reach imo. I also worry from the limited time I've seen him about his athleticism and ability to get his shot off in the NBA. That may be way off though. Love him.

Buffoonery, I'd take him with the Jazz's 1st round pick. There will probably be other players I'd rather take, but he is someone I would heavily consider depending on who is taken in front of that pick.
 
I haven't seen one second of Fultz but I'll guess he'll be the classic stat stuffer, losing team guy.

No, he is the clear cut best player in the draft on a terrible team. He isn't a losing player by any means. You put him on UCLA he has the same stats and they probably win just as many games, if not more, than they do with Ball.
 
No, he is the clear cut best player in the draft on a terrible team. He isn't a losing player by any means. You put him on UCLA he has the same stats and they probably win just as many games, if not more, than they do with Ball.

I don't think so. You put Ball on Washington and they win more games.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
 
Back
Top