What's new

Following potential 2017 draftees...

Lyles and 24 for 12? Would you do it? I'm confused by the first part of your reply.

I would do Lyles + 24 for 12 if one of the players I like is there.

I was responding to #24, Lyles and Diaw for Jon Leuer and #12... This I wouldn't do.


Lyles + Diaw for Leuer + 12
or
24 + Diaw for Leuer +12

Those are closer value-wise IMO. And I still wouldn't do them because I don't want to be paying Leuer 10M for 3 years, while we are haemorrhage for capspace.
 
What I don't get is how every one seems hell bent on keeping hill? There are way more affordable options out there.

Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app

He's really good... better than Rubio, Bledsoe, etc. and is affordable. He fits perfectly. He's not injury prone, just had bad luck. Hill at 4/80 is much better imo than trading what it would cost to get a downgrade on a better contract. He's also won more and has experience... it helped us a ton this year.

He's also one of the closest guys with Hayward (from what I hear).

I'm not paying the guy 4/132 but 4/80-100 is reasonable. I'm also not the biggest believer in Dante.
 
I would do Lyles + 24 for 12 if one of the players I like is there.

I was responding to #24, Lyles and Diaw for Jon Leuer and #12... This I wouldn't do.


Lyles + Diaw for Leuer + 12
or
24 + Diaw for Leuer +12

Those are closer value-wise IMO. And I still wouldn't do them because I don't want to be paying Leuer 10M for 3 years, while we are haemorrhage for capspace.

No way Pistons would do that, not even close value wise.
 
I would do Lyles + 24 for 12 if one of the players I like is there.

I was responding to #24, Lyles and Diaw for Jon Leuer and #12... This I wouldn't do.


Lyles + Diaw for Leuer + 12
or
24 + Diaw for Leuer +12

Those are closer value-wise IMO. And I still wouldn't do them because I don't want to be paying Leuer 10M for 3 years, while we are haemorrhage for capspace.

That's what I thought... thx.

SVG gets okay role players as the GM but pays them 30% too much every time... now they are going to need to dump someone.
 
I hate dumping Favors. And I hate taking Harris' contract. I prefer signing any of Hill, Hayward and Ingles to getting Harris' contract.

Just one caveat... if we dumped Favs we'd get future assets or cheaper young guys... just meant his salary has to come off the books.
 
Do you think Leuer has positive value? I don't. They need to pay. 3 year x10M contract!

Right but its not that negative in a vacuum. He's worth 6-8 per year, but for us it screws us up enough cap wise to not make sense for us.
 
He's really good... better than Rubio, Bledsoe, etc. and is affordable. He fits perfectly. He's not injury prone, just had bad luck. Hill at 4/80 is much better imo than trading what it would cost to get a downgrade on a better contract. He's also won more and has experience... it helped us a ton this year.

He's also one of the closest guys with Hayward (from what I hear).


I'm not paying the guy 4/132 but 4/80-100 is reasonable. I'm also not the biggest believer in Dante.

I would do 3 years 60 million but he is to old and to hurt to go 4 years and I would not go any more then 20 million.

I would rather look at some one in the 10 to 13 million and spend the remainder on finding another bench scorer.
 
Back
Top